13-07-2018 18:59
Wendy UntereinerDear Forum members.I'm looking for freshly collect
12-07-2018 23:27
Andgelo Mombert
Bonsoir,Sur tiges mortes de Cirsium spinosissimum.
12-07-2018 22:08
Andgelo Mombert
Bonsoir,Sur Alnus alnobetula. Chablais, France.Apo
09-07-2018 23:07
Andgelo Mombert
Bonsoir,Belle petite espèce trouvée sur Adenosty
09-07-2018 16:54
Blasco Rafael
Hola he recogido esta Scutellinia sobre musgos en
11-07-2018 12:54
Malcolm StoreyHere's a puzzle from a few years ago http://www.b
10-07-2018 19:52
Blasco Rafael
Hola, esta especie no se a que genero acercarme, r
09-07-2018 20:23
Blasco Rafael
Esta otra Scutellinia estaba cerca de la anterior
Our common friend P. Zapico has found at his home these gregarious, blackish, roundish, papillate and ostiolate, carbonaceous, perithecia 0.9-1.4 mm in diam. growing over on more or less persistent subiculum on very rotten wood of a cut Salix babylonica.
The asci are cylindrical, 8-spored, 155-170 x 8.5-9 microns, pars sporifera 110-138 with a conspicuous apical apparatus Melzer deep blue 5-6 x 4 micr.
The ascospores are ellipsoid, equilateral, brownish at maturity, with straight germ slit nearly as long as spore, situated on the more convex side, and 1(-2) semiglobose cellular appendage (-s) surrounded by a partial, narrow slimy sheath. (14.7-)16.3(-18.2) x (6.5-)7.0(-8.0); Q = 2.1-2.5
I feel this fungus could be near to Rosellinia akulovii L.E. Petrini but I'd like to know your opinion.
Many thanks in advance for your help
it's good to hear from you and Pedro!
The overall morphology and the ascospores with cellular appendages and germ slit on the convex side clearly set this Rosellinia in the aquila-corticium group. Based on ascospores and apical apparatus dimensions and sheath morphology I would call it R. aquila, even though the ascospores are a bit small. I have seen a wide range of variations in this species, from small-spored collections like yours to large-spored ones grading into R. corticium. They might represent different species but they are difficult to separate based on morphology only.
I do not know R. akulovii for comparison.
Sorry Enrique, I guess you are not going to like my answer!
Cheers,
Jacques
Hi Jacques
No. I like very much your expert opinion on this very difficult genus, at least for me.
Many thanks, Jacques!





