
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

11-10-2025 20:27

Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro

09-10-2025 22:14
S. RebeccaWe just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au

10-10-2025 00:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw
Our common friend P. Zapico has found at his home these gregarious, blackish, roundish, papillate and ostiolate, carbonaceous, perithecia 0.9-1.4 mm in diam. growing over on more or less persistent subiculum on very rotten wood of a cut Salix babylonica.
The asci are cylindrical, 8-spored, 155-170 x 8.5-9 microns, pars sporifera 110-138 with a conspicuous apical apparatus Melzer deep blue 5-6 x 4 micr.
The ascospores are ellipsoid, equilateral, brownish at maturity, with straight germ slit nearly as long as spore, situated on the more convex side, and 1(-2) semiglobose cellular appendage (-s) surrounded by a partial, narrow slimy sheath. (14.7-)16.3(-18.2) x (6.5-)7.0(-8.0); Q = 2.1-2.5
I feel this fungus could be near to Rosellinia akulovii L.E. Petrini but I'd like to know your opinion.
Many thanks in advance for your help

it's good to hear from you and Pedro!
The overall morphology and the ascospores with cellular appendages and germ slit on the convex side clearly set this Rosellinia in the aquila-corticium group. Based on ascospores and apical apparatus dimensions and sheath morphology I would call it R. aquila, even though the ascospores are a bit small. I have seen a wide range of variations in this species, from small-spored collections like yours to large-spored ones grading into R. corticium. They might represent different species but they are difficult to separate based on morphology only.
I do not know R. akulovii for comparison.
Sorry Enrique, I guess you are not going to like my answer!
Cheers,
Jacques
Hi Jacques
No. I like very much your expert opinion on this very difficult genus, at least for me.
Many thanks, Jacques!