23-03-2023 21:15
Riet van Oosten
Found by Laurens van der Linde, March 2023 on Rosa
23-03-2023 12:36
Edvin Johannesen
These black, erumpent, initially closed apothecia
23-03-2023 15:54
Edvin Johannesen
Apothecia ca. 1 mm in diam. Somewhat downy on the
21-03-2023 09:37
Margot en Geert VullingsOn the same betula branch as of the Trimmatostroma
23-03-2023 14:39
Bernard Declercq
Hi there,I am looking for following paper:Phookams
23-03-2023 12:35
Edvin Johannesen
These black, erumpent, initially closed apothecia
25-05-2013 15:18
Gilles Corriol
Je tente à nouveau ma chance avec un Dactylospora
23-03-2023 09:49
Does anyone have a copy of this manuscript?TORRE M
Our common friend P. Zapico has found at his home these gregarious, blackish, roundish, papillate and ostiolate, carbonaceous, perithecia 0.9-1.4 mm in diam. growing over on more or less persistent subiculum on very rotten wood of a cut Salix babylonica.
The asci are cylindrical, 8-spored, 155-170 x 8.5-9 microns, pars sporifera 110-138 with a conspicuous apical apparatus Melzer deep blue 5-6 x 4 micr.
The ascospores are ellipsoid, equilateral, brownish at maturity, with straight germ slit nearly as long as spore, situated on the more convex side, and 1(-2) semiglobose cellular appendage (-s) surrounded by a partial, narrow slimy sheath. (14.7-)16.3(-18.2) x (6.5-)7.0(-8.0); Q = 2.1-2.5
I feel this fungus could be near to Rosellinia akulovii L.E. Petrini but I'd like to know your opinion.
Many thanks in advance for your help
it's good to hear from you and Pedro!
The overall morphology and the ascospores with cellular appendages and germ slit on the convex side clearly set this Rosellinia in the aquila-corticium group. Based on ascospores and apical apparatus dimensions and sheath morphology I would call it R. aquila, even though the ascospores are a bit small. I have seen a wide range of variations in this species, from small-spored collections like yours to large-spored ones grading into R. corticium. They might represent different species but they are difficult to separate based on morphology only.
I do not know R. akulovii for comparison.
Sorry Enrique, I guess you are not going to like my answer!
Cheers,
Jacques
Hi Jacques
No. I like very much your expert opinion on this very difficult genus, at least for me.
Many thanks, Jacques!





