24-03-2026 19:59
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following
21-03-2026 15:13
Lepista ZacariasHello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
24-03-2026 21:07
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
Little "tongues"
Dragiša Savic,
23-04-2014 11:55
Björn Wergen,
23-04-2014 20:11
Re : Little "tongues"
Hi,
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
Andrew N. Miller,
23-04-2014 21:37
Re : Little "tongues"
Looks like an old Rhytidhysteron to me.
Andy
Andy
Christian Lechat,
23-04-2014 21:43
Re : Little "tongues"
I think it is not a fungus
Chr1stian
Chr1stian
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 08:17
Re : Little "tongues"
Thank you all but I guess I'll have to look for her again.
Alain GARDIENNET,
24-04-2014 13:59
Re : Little "tongues"
Probably a single vertical cut would have give an information. I agree with Andy but we have too much little informations.
What is the substrate ?
Alain
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 14:57
Re : Little "tongues"
The substrate is Fagus sylvatica. They were completely rotten and attached to a tree on one side, so I called them tongues. I've never seen Rhytidhysteron and Hysterographium on photos look same but it is much smaller, I found him (http://www.naturefg.com/pages/b-fungi/hysterographium% 20flexuosum.htm)