03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
07-09-2025 11:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
05-09-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari
05-09-2025 18:53
Robin Isaksson
Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75
04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
Little "tongues"
Dragiša Savic,
23-04-2014 11:55
Björn Wergen,
23-04-2014 20:11
Re : Little "tongues"
Hi,
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
Andrew N. Miller,
23-04-2014 21:37
Re : Little "tongues"
Looks like an old Rhytidhysteron to me.
Andy
Andy
Christian Lechat,
23-04-2014 21:43
Re : Little "tongues"
I think it is not a fungus
Chr1stian
Chr1stian
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 08:17
Re : Little "tongues"
Thank you all but I guess I'll have to look for her again.
Alain GARDIENNET,
24-04-2014 13:59
Re : Little "tongues"
Probably a single vertical cut would have give an information. I agree with Andy but we have too much little informations.
What is the substrate ?
Alain
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 14:57
Re : Little "tongues"
The substrate is Fagus sylvatica. They were completely rotten and attached to a tree on one side, so I called them tongues. I've never seen Rhytidhysteron and Hysterographium on photos look same but it is much smaller, I found him (http://www.naturefg.com/pages/b-fungi/hysterographium% 20flexuosum.htm)