Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-04-2025 01:29

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, I found Dactylellina candida/candidum, recent

29-04-2025 09:13

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumVosges du sud, ballon d'Alsace altitu

28-04-2025 12:51

Thomas Flammer

Substrate: Angelica sylvesrisSpore mass: 8.4 - 11.

12-05-2013 13:31

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Dear mycologists,could someone give me an advice a

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

26-04-2025 07:15

Dragiša Savic

Hello everyone,the lichen is Candelariella aurella

27-04-2025 15:54

Martin Bemmann Martin Bemmann

Can somebody provide this article from a Leningrad

14-04-2025 15:11

Lennert Gees

Greetings!For my master's dissertation I work on c

26-04-2025 16:01

Jacques Fournier Jacques Fournier

J'ai le regret d'informer les membres du forum qui

26-04-2025 19:32

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found these small Arachnopeziza sp. growing on d

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 14:02
Enrique RubioDear friends
 
Under a melanized, epidermial blackish tissue with inconspicuous perithecial mounds, we have collected these inmersed, isolated. not really stromatic perithecia up to 0.2 mm in diameter under a clypeate structure.
The long cylindrical 8-spored asci have an appical apparatus IKI bb and the brownish (at maturity) ascospores have a germ-slit full spore lenght and they have not visible appendages.


The fungus was on still attached branches of Berberis vulgaris at 1700 m of altitude.

With the classic keys I arrive to the genus Anthostomella. What do you think?    

Thanks again 

  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 14:26
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hola Enrique,
possibly Anthostomella but not a common species at first view. I checked Lu & Hyde's monograph to no avail. Could you be more specific about the clypei, are they separate or do they form a superficial pseudostroma by coalescing? Are the asci short or long pedicellate? Do ascospores have a mucilaginous sheath? something to test in India ink, just add a small drop to the edge of a water mount, it's better than to observe directly in India ink, otherwise dilute it.
Buena suerte!
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 17:49
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques


There are a superficial, thin and continuous blackish pseudostroma over the isolated perithecia, but at this level it seems to be thicker.
I have seen any mucilaginous sheath or appendages in china ink or nigrosine. The asci are shortly stipitate (i.e 55 microns long for the pars sporifera vs 35 for the stipes)
  • message #24269
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 18:20
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
thanks for the information, after checking the key in the monograph I failed to find a match. Anyway the continuous pseudostroma is not typical of Anthostomella. It rather recalls the fungi placed in Lopadostoma subgenus Anthostomopsis Rappaz (1995), as do the ellipsoid-equilateral ascospores. There are only three species in that subgenus, one L. flavoviride has ascospores that might fit but the peudostroma is said to be green black. Is that the case?
Tell me if you don't have Rappaz paper.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:51
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques

Yes. I have Rappaz's papier. Maybe you are right because some little areas of the pseudostroma have faintly yellowish/greenish hues but only at the surface.
  • message #24272
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:54
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Can you see them in the image?
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 19:06
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
hum, not striking! I would not advise you to use this name, maybe someone will have a better idea.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 19:22
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Of course! They are not so conspicuous! 

Thanks, Jacques