Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 14:02
Enrique RubioDear friends
 
Under a melanized, epidermial blackish tissue with inconspicuous perithecial mounds, we have collected these inmersed, isolated. not really stromatic perithecia up to 0.2 mm in diameter under a clypeate structure.
The long cylindrical 8-spored asci have an appical apparatus IKI bb and the brownish (at maturity) ascospores have a germ-slit full spore lenght and they have not visible appendages.


The fungus was on still attached branches of Berberis vulgaris at 1700 m of altitude.

With the classic keys I arrive to the genus Anthostomella. What do you think?    

Thanks again 

  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
  • message #24258
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 14:26
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hola Enrique,
possibly Anthostomella but not a common species at first view. I checked Lu & Hyde's monograph to no avail. Could you be more specific about the clypei, are they separate or do they form a superficial pseudostroma by coalescing? Are the asci short or long pedicellate? Do ascospores have a mucilaginous sheath? something to test in India ink, just add a small drop to the edge of a water mount, it's better than to observe directly in India ink, otherwise dilute it.
Buena suerte!
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 17:49
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques


There are a superficial, thin and continuous blackish pseudostroma over the isolated perithecia, but at this level it seems to be thicker.
I have seen any mucilaginous sheath or appendages in china ink or nigrosine. The asci are shortly stipitate (i.e 55 microns long for the pars sporifera vs 35 for the stipes)
  • message #24269
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 18:20
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
thanks for the information, after checking the key in the monograph I failed to find a match. Anyway the continuous pseudostroma is not typical of Anthostomella. It rather recalls the fungi placed in Lopadostoma subgenus Anthostomopsis Rappaz (1995), as do the ellipsoid-equilateral ascospores. There are only three species in that subgenus, one L. flavoviride has ascospores that might fit but the peudostroma is said to be green black. Is that the case?
Tell me if you don't have Rappaz paper.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:51
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Hi Jacques

Yes. I have Rappaz's papier. Maybe you are right because some little areas of the pseudostroma have faintly yellowish/greenish hues but only at the surface.
  • message #24272
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 18:54
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Can you see them in the image?
Jacques Fournier, 04-07-2013 19:06
Jacques Fournier
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
hum, not striking! I would not advise you to use this name, maybe someone will have a better idea.
Cheers,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 04-07-2013 19:22
Enrique Rubio
Re : Anthostomella (?) on Berberis
Of course! They are not so conspicuous! 

Thanks, Jacques