
20-06-2025 08:33
Hello.Small, blackish, mucronated surface grains s

19-06-2025 22:19
Björn NordénBig thanks in advance.

11-06-2025 16:26
Hi everyone, I am looking for the following protol

18-06-2025 19:24

Good evening,On Oenanthe aquatica we collected a

18-06-2025 16:24

Bonjour,Un minuscule stade imparfait, qui pousse s

13-06-2025 16:34

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

17-06-2025 12:10
Del pasado dia 4 en bosque de hayas, en tierraA

12-03-2025 17:54
Karl Soler KinnerbäckHi all!Do you agree with Scutellinia hyperborea? P

17-06-2025 12:02
Del pasado sabado, en bosque de hayas y avellanos,
lachnum literature
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 05:11

Haines JH. Studies in Hyaloscyphaceae VI: the genus Lachnum (Ascommycetes) of the Guayana Highlands. Nova Hedwigia. 1992;54:97–112.
thank you so much
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-04-2012 08:29

Re : lachnum literature
I have this paper but not in a digital version. Let's first see if someone has it.
Zotto
Zotto
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 08:52

Re : lachnum literature
I am sorry, that is the one I am missing too!
Stip
Stip
Baeza Yajaira,
17-04-2012 16:10

Re : lachnum literature
no problem! thank you so much anyway Zotto and Stip. i am waiting if somebody else have it :D !!!
Greetings :D
Greetings :D
Chris Yeates,
17-04-2012 22:44
Stip Helleman,
17-04-2012 22:47

Re : lachnum literature
Thanks a lot Chris,
Stip
Stip
François Valade,
18-04-2012 11:36

Re : lachnum literature
Thank you Chris.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Note that for the combination page 103, the epithet is badly written. For a neutral name, it must end by -um (fer, fera, ferum)
Lachnum fimbriiferum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Haines
= Dasyscyphys fimbriifer (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Sacc.
= Peziza fimbriifera Berk. & M.A. Curtis
same for neblinensis, for a neutral name it should be Lachnum neblinense Haines
but Lachnum patena is right because patena is a substantive. I read Lachnum patinum in Wang, Y.-z.(2003). A new species and a new record of Lachnum from Taiwan.Mycotaxon 87:139. it is clearly wrong.
Baeza Yajaira,
18-04-2012 16:35

Re : lachnum literature
thank you so much Chris! :D