20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
20-03-2026 16:16
Edvin Johannesen
These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through
19-03-2026 19:34
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
19-03-2026 17:50
Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
micropodia
NC NC,
09-06-2009 11:43
Il y a 10 ans environ je considérais que Micropodia pteridina que l'on trouve traditionnellement sur les parties noircies et souterraines de fougère aigle et Psilachnum chrysostigmum sur tiges de fougère ou prèle étaient synonymes ce dernier étant prioritaire; j'ai un doute maintenant, d'autant que les deux espèces sont mentionnées dans la base Ascofrance et l'Index Fungorum.. Qu'en est t-il exactement ?
Amitiés
Robert
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-06-2009 11:55
Re:micropodia
Hi Robert
how are you?
This question is really quite old and still not progressed. The type of M. pteridina which I studied long ago is certainly another species than that which you know. It also grew on Pteridium but not on the blackened bases, and seems to me to be a pteridicolous Diplonaevia.
That on the blackened bases is a Psilachnum but differs from P. chrysostigmum in the absence of croziers. It has so far no name.
Zotto
how are you?
This question is really quite old and still not progressed. The type of M. pteridina which I studied long ago is certainly another species than that which you know. It also grew on Pteridium but not on the blackened bases, and seems to me to be a pteridicolous Diplonaevia.
That on the blackened bases is a Psilachnum but differs from P. chrysostigmum in the absence of croziers. It has so far no name.
Zotto