Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-11-2025 21:34

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip

03-11-2025 19:41

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,Does anyone knows which genus could this be? G

28-10-2025 15:37

Carl Farmer

I'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik

03-11-2025 16:30

Hans-Otto Baral Hans-Otto Baral

Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye

01-11-2025 09:14

Francis Maggi

Bonjour,Trouvé sur Xanthoria parietina à Valdebl

28-10-2025 19:33

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r

31-10-2025 09:19

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

Can somebody provide me with a file of:Rogerson CT

30-10-2025 03:53

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I would like an opinion on whether this

09-08-2025 13:13

Maria Plekkenpol Maria Plekkenpol

Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth

29-10-2025 19:02

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De la pasada semana en rama posiblemente de hayaPi

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lambertella tubulosa
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 14:54
Can someone tell me more about this mushroom please?
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = LSU ok, 99.65% Lambertella
tubulosa MH872970, Tricladium splendens OR243764, and others
Can ITS analysis be interpreted differently?

Bojan
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 19:49
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Hello

it is great to have a sequence similarity for LSU, but ITS would be definitely more valiable because it is more frequently used.

Besides, it would be much helpful if you could provide micros in water from the fresh fungus.

What I can see is that croziers are present. But not even spore size is available. This could be an interesting case, but it could also be the common Hymenoscyphus imberbis, which is a complex I suspect.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:06
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thanks Hans-Oto for the quick reply. I also found measurements of spores, unfortunately there are not enough measurements, maybe it will be enough. Even the first ITS research: 
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = ITS ok, 99.83% undetermined
Helotiales MZ650953, 98% Zalerion, Helicodendron, Halenospora and
others, LSU?
  • message #80569
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:28
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
In the water
  • message #80570
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 22:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
The paraphysis is dead but remnants of the refractive vacuoles (VBs) are visible.
Actually I see a 100% match between MZ650953 and
KC411993 Hymenoscyphus imberbis strain HB 6797 from Tübingen.
This was a typical representative f that species collected by me. So your specimen is also H. imberbis.
An unpublished LSU of H. imberbis (HB 7894 from Mongolia, without ITS) is 99.8% to L. tubulosa (e.g. CBS 125202), Centrospora clavata, Tricladium obesum and Spirosphaera floriformis. But in ITS blast of my H. imberbis I get only Tricladium obesum with 97.5% and Lambertella tubulosa with 97%. So these are obviously not conspecific and LSU is not useful for species delimitation.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 22:16
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thank you for the comprehensive and supported answer
Greetings from Slovenia
Bojan