Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-06-2026 14:33

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a PDF copy of the followin

02-06-2026 17:58

Louis DENY

Bonjour forum, Sur feuille de Populus tremula, en

31-05-2026 22:53

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je n'ai pas d'idée pour cette esp

28-07-2011 18:31

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

12-11-2019 10:32

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous

25-12-2019 17:54

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en

12-07-2015 00:05

Nedim Jukic Nedim Jukic

This one from the same locality as the previous on

28-08-2014 18:36

Rubén Martínez-Gil Rubén Martínez-Gil

Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de un asco que enco

30-05-2026 21:12

Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lambertella tubulosa
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 14:54
Can someone tell me more about this mushroom please?
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = LSU ok, 99.65% Lambertella
tubulosa MH872970, Tricladium splendens OR243764, and others
Can ITS analysis be interpreted differently?

Bojan
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 19:49
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Hello

it is great to have a sequence similarity for LSU, but ITS would be definitely more valiable because it is more frequently used.

Besides, it would be much helpful if you could provide micros in water from the fresh fungus.

What I can see is that croziers are present. But not even spore size is available. This could be an interesting case, but it could also be the common Hymenoscyphus imberbis, which is a complex I suspect.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:06
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thanks Hans-Oto for the quick reply. I also found measurements of spores, unfortunately there are not enough measurements, maybe it will be enough. Even the first ITS research: 
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = ITS ok, 99.83% undetermined
Helotiales MZ650953, 98% Zalerion, Helicodendron, Halenospora and
others, LSU?
  • message #80569
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:28
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
In the water
  • message #80570
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 22:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
The paraphysis is dead but remnants of the refractive vacuoles (VBs) are visible.
Actually I see a 100% match between MZ650953 and
KC411993 Hymenoscyphus imberbis strain HB 6797 from Tübingen.
This was a typical representative f that species collected by me. So your specimen is also H. imberbis.
An unpublished LSU of H. imberbis (HB 7894 from Mongolia, without ITS) is 99.8% to L. tubulosa (e.g. CBS 125202), Centrospora clavata, Tricladium obesum and Spirosphaera floriformis. But in ITS blast of my H. imberbis I get only Tricladium obesum with 97.5% and Lambertella tubulosa with 97%. So these are obviously not conspecific and LSU is not useful for species delimitation.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 22:16
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thank you for the comprehensive and supported answer
Greetings from Slovenia
Bojan