06-12-2024 16:10
B Shelbourne• Macro and habitat appear mollisioid.• Mollis
19-11-2024 00:36
Pérez del Amo Carlos ManuelHace unos días encontramos numerosos ejemplares d
02-12-2024 19:02
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a fallen branch, probably Acer, we found these
05-12-2024 16:38
Karl Soler KinnerbäckA Melastiza from Padjelanta, alpine Sweden, on cal
06-12-2024 10:28
Jiri MalicekHello, would anybody help me with ID of this unusu
05-12-2024 20:43
Juuso ÄikäsI found these black pyrenos a few days ago growing
05-12-2024 18:11
Yanick BOULANGERBonsoir Quelqu'un a t-il une idée de ce que c'es
Bryostroma
Elisabeth Stöckli,
16-09-2024 14:20
Sur une pierre recouverte de mousse (forêt de montagne à 2'000m), périthèces piriformes avec une petite papille, 0.15 - 0.25 mm de diamètre, ascus bituniqué, avec huit pores, IKI-, 120 - 150 x 20 - 25 µm, spores verruqueuses, hyalines, à deux cellules, 20 - 32 x 8 - 10 µm. Ces caractéristiques me font penser à B. popei, sauf que mes spores sont plus larges. Qu'en pensez-vous ? Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Elisabeth
Georges Greiff,
22-09-2024 20:50
Re : Bryostroma
Dear Elisabeth,
Excellent find and documentation as always. This does indeed seem to be a Bryostroma. It will be important to identify the host. The type species, B. racomitrii, is possible, though it should have a mixture of 8- and 4-spored asci. B. axillare is also close. All the known species are in the B. popei paper key.
But there are likely many undescribed species around. I have one on Racomitrium fasciculare with 4-spored asci but much smaller spores than B. racomitrii, so it must be something new. But the collection was too small!
All the best,
George
Excellent find and documentation as always. This does indeed seem to be a Bryostroma. It will be important to identify the host. The type species, B. racomitrii, is possible, though it should have a mixture of 8- and 4-spored asci. B. axillare is also close. All the known species are in the B. popei paper key.
But there are likely many undescribed species around. I have one on Racomitrium fasciculare with 4-spored asci but much smaller spores than B. racomitrii, so it must be something new. But the collection was too small!
All the best,
George