10-06-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl
09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
10-06-2026 23:08
éric ROMERO
Bonjour tous, Je vous propose un Mollisia trouvé
10-06-2026 21:16
François Freléchoux
Bonsoir,Le dernier du jour, en attendant votre avi
10-06-2026 21:07
François Freléchoux
Toutes les tiges de gentianes jaunes de l'an passÃ
10-06-2026 13:41
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.
10-06-2026 11:53
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of
10-06-2026 10:45
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui
08-06-2026 10:16
Spooren Marco
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
10-06-2026 09:24
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do
Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
ruiz Jose,
20-02-2024 22:58
puede encajar en macroguttatus?
Nihad Omerovic,
21-02-2024 00:32
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Looks like Rutstroemia, possibly R. henningsiana/paludosa (not sure about croziers).
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 08:03
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Nihad,las estructuras del excipulo no parecen de rutstroemia.
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-02-2024 08:50
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Yes it is rutstroemiaceous from the apical ring shape. Croziers seem to be absent, so R. henningsiana/paludosa would be the choice (now Clarireedia). But the host looks like Equisetum?
Michel Hairaud,
21-02-2024 09:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hi Ruiz,Â
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .Â
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.Â
Amitiés
Michel
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .Â
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.Â
Amitiés
Michel
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:21
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Ok,muchas gracias,por la la aclaración,el excipulo no me pareció de Rutstroemia.saludos
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
No sabrÃa precisar la planta Zotto.
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:31
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Michel,me queda algo del único ejemplar,lo intentaré hacer,pero en estos tamaños tan diminutos me cuesta sacar cortes apropiados.saludos y gracias