Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-11-2025 13:59

ID Help Hymenoscyphus
Nogueira Héctor

November 14, 2025 Brazuelo (León) SPAIN Hymenosc

17-11-2025 19:14

Cheilymenia crucipila
herman lambert

Apothécie discoïde 0.6 cm diam., orangeFace hymÃ

17-11-2025 21:57

Hyaloscypha fuckelii var. alniseta
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois de feuillu mort dur, no

16-11-2025 21:09

Hyphomycete on twig of abies
Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Anyone recognize this acc. to pictures.? Found on

17-11-2025 21:46

Lachnum impudicum
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois pourrissant de feuillu

14-11-2025 16:26

Small species on Cytisus scoparius
Marian Jagers Marian Jagers

Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius

15-11-2025 23:22

Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus? on Phytolacca
Mario Filippa

Hello,this is what I think to be Hymenoscyphus mac

15-11-2025 20:25

Cryptosphaeria ligniota?
Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Nov. 2025

15-11-2025 09:21

Anamorph on Buxus.
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph resembling Capronia is sprouting

14-11-2025 18:31

literature request
Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

Hello,can somebody provide me with a file of:Rothe

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tricharina
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 22:54
Bonsoir,

récolte au sol, apothécie 8 mm pour la plus grande, spores 16-19 x 9,5-11 µm.

J'y verrais bien Tricharina praecox...
Merci d'avance pour vos avis éventuels.

Patrice
Patrice TANCHAUD, 17-01-2024 23:26
Re : Tricharina
En poursuivant les recherches, je vois que T. ochroleuca pourrait être un bon prétendant...

A voir.
Uwe Lindemann, 18-01-2024 14:40
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Hi Patrice,
T. ochroleuca is a nomen dubium.
Regarding the shape of the ascospores I would suggest hiemalis, subhiemals or tophiseda. Did you use the key in the following paper? https://ascomycete.org/Journal/Article/art-0363
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 10:31
Re : Tricharina
Many thanks Uwe for this reference, I had not considered this publication, although it is of great importance given the quality of the work with sequencing. The spores, without guttules or granules, seem to eliminate T. tophiseda, then concluding between T. hiemalis and T. subhiemalis seems more difficult without DNA.
Uwe Lindemann, 19-01-2024 12:37
Uwe Lindemann
Re : Tricharina
Because of the spore quotient, I would tend towards hiemalis. But to be absolutely sure, sequencing would be necessary.
Best, Uwe
Patrice TANCHAUD, 19-01-2024 17:44
Re : Tricharina
We agree. Thanks.