Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

26-01-2026 11:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

25-01-2026 16:08

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

23-01-2026 21:50

Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

21-01-2026 19:55

Bohan Jia

Hi,  Could this be Nemania aureolutea? Or did I

21-01-2026 16:32

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich

21-01-2026 16:48

Gernot Friebes

Hi,after my last unknown hyphomycete on this subst

20-01-2026 17:49

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

I offer this collection as a possibility only as e

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
Christine VALANCE, 19-02-2023 18:11
Un petit asco sur bois décortiqué de pin. J'étais partie pour un hymenoscyphus, mais les spores ne correspondent pas.Les asques mesurés après dissociation ne dépassent pas 30 µ. Qu'en pensez vous ?
  • message #75245
  • message #75245
Hans-Otto Baral, 19-02-2023 21:03
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
This is clearly "Cudoniella" buissonii. I have it in Calycina (Antino-alike). A nice fungus, the guttules in the paraphyses are ver typical and never there in Ciliolarina.

Could you please send me the collection data , I would like to put them to your images.

In 2005 I had studied the type of this species which may get convex and resemble a minute Cudoniella.
Michel Hairaud, 19-02-2023 21:15
Michel Hairaud
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
Bonsoir Christine, 
Je suppose que tu as aussi vu des poils verruqueux à la manière des Cistella ? dont le genre Cicliolarina se distingue par des paraphyses à vacuoles réfringentes homogènes. 
As tu mesuré les spores ? 
Le genre n'est pas simple ! Je serais tenté de dire que ton ID est plausible, mais la distinction avec laetifica n'est pas évidente. 

AmitiésMichel
Christine VALANCE, 20-02-2023 19:11
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
Les photos
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
  • message #75258
Hans-Otto Baral, 20-02-2023 21:10
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
These pics are too much reduced to see anything, sorry.
Christine VALANCE, 21-02-2023 18:52
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
Now i think its OK. And thank you very much
  • message #75272
  • message #75272
  • message #75272
  • message #75272
  • message #75272
Hans-Otto Baral, 21-02-2023 19:38
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
This is now very good. What I forgot to say: Ciliolarina apothecia have never such a long stalk.

Would you mind sending me the collection data? Thanks.
Christine VALANCE, 21-02-2023 20:47
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
20023/02/10, on Pinus halepensis, Forêt de Fabregas 83500 La Seyne sur mer France, lat 43.078601° Long 5.863684° Alt 54,92 m
Hans-Otto Baral, 21-02-2023 21:32
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciliolarina neglecta ou...
Thnx a lot! Google Earth says 75 m alt.