20-04-2024 16:02
Michel HairaudBonjour,On me fait part, pour diffusion d une list
20-04-2024 09:56
Josep TorresHello.A few apothecia collected on Sunday, April 7
19-04-2024 14:28
B ShelbourneCudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit
13-04-2024 11:44
Riet van OostenHello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, April 2024
16-04-2024 17:43
Giovanni ANTOLABonjour,Trouvé sous paille humide, autour d'un je
17-04-2024 10:44
Bernard CLESSEJuste à côté du cône avec "Hyphodiscus ayelii"
16-04-2024 22:53
Bernard CLESSEBonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
On 5 August 2022, a friend gave me a piece of a branch of Ulmus (13 cm long, 2.5 cm in diameter) covered with an anamorph. Under those white/pink spots, the bark was covered with green algae and lichens.
The conidia with 1 sept (slightly off-centre and slightly contracted there) have the following dimensions: 20.3 - 24.5 × 10.6 - 12.7 µm; Q = 1.8 - 2.2 ; Me = 22.5 × 11.6 µm .
When wiping off those downy spots I found white bumps in the bark, under which were black perithecia with 1 ostiole that contained very dark spores with following dimensions:
43 - 55.5 × 18.6 - 22.6 µm; Q = 2 - 2.7; Me = 50 × 20.9 µm.
Due to the age of the branch, the prevailing dryness and heat, the material to be examined was in poor condition. With the key of ME Barr Mycotaxon Vol XV 1982 I could identify the ascomata as: Splanchnonema foedans.
My question is twofold: 1) Can someone confirm my determination?
2) Is the anamorph related to S. foedans and can it be identified?
Many thanks in advance,
François Bartholomeeusen
This is Splanchnonema foedans indeed, most probably a new species for Flanders.
The anamorph is Arthobotrys-like.
All the best,
Bernard
Despite the poor condition of the substrate, this is still a good find. Your choice for Arthrobotrys is more than plausible. I'm leaving for a week in the coolness of the coast and will try to elaborate on this find upon my return.
Thanks again for your reaction,
François