09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
08-06-2026 10:16
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
08-06-2026 17:00
François BartholomeeusenGood day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de
07-06-2026 15:10
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco
05-06-2026 11:02
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596691
07-06-2026 12:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici une brève description de ce qui m
07-06-2026 12:43
Steve ClementsBojour. This was a strange find on a stick on my
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
06-06-2026 17:44
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco was on planed wood 3 x 1.5 cm
Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 15:09
Hi all,Does anyone have any idea about genus ID of this small fungus (0.1 mm in diam) found on Conocephalum sp.?
It has been found on 25th of July this year at 1700 m asl on the glacial lake shore in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Here is data about spores size:
(12.5) 13.3 - 19.8 (21) × (2.4) 2.6 - 3.5 (4.4) µm
Q = (3.8) 4.8 - 6.7 (7.7) ; N = 20
Me = 16.5 × 3 µm ; Qe = 5.5
Cheers,
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-10-2021 16:55
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
I only know Bryoscyphus marchantiae on that substrate, but the narrow spores and shape of apical rin are totally different.
Any idea of the paraphyses and their contents? No hairs?
Zotto
Nedim Jukic,
30-10-2021 17:20
Re : Bryophilous Fungi on Conocephalum
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,
Thanks for you comment.
As a matter of fact I have noticed one hair but I was not sure whether or not it come from fungi or something else.
Here is some more photos, some with paraphyses but not clearly visible.
Looks like there is some disperse content and not concentrate refreactive VBs.
I am familiar with B. marchantiae, and besides differences you have mentioned this one is way to smaller.
Cheers,













