25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
INCONNU
Alain Delannoy,
16-10-2021 19:50
Bonjour;
Sur écorce morte de Fagus.
Taille 2 - 2,5 mm
IKI -
Spores 28 - 31 x 5-6 µ
Aucune idée du genre...
Merci de votre aide,
Alain D.
Mirek Gryc,
16-10-2021 20:11
Re : INCONNU
Hi Alain
Compare with Phaeohelotium geogenum.
More specifically, check the IKI reaction should be positive.
In the event of uncertainty, use KOH first.
You should also check the presence of croziers.
regards
Mirek
Compare with Phaeohelotium geogenum.
More specifically, check the IKI reaction should be positive.
In the event of uncertainty, use KOH first.
You should also check the presence of croziers.
regards
Mirek
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-10-2021 20:37
Re : INCONNU
Hi Alain and Mirek
Yes, most often on Quercus remnants but rarely on other trees. IKI should stain a small ring, perhaps visible under oil immersion?
Very typical is that the spores contain large low-refractive vacuoles with a few minute LBs around, well visible on your photos.
Zotto
Alain Delannoy,
16-10-2021 20:43
Re : INCONNU
Merci à vous,
J'ai testé KOH avant IKI, pas de réaction, je vais recommencé l'essai.
OK pour crozier, je vais vérifier, j'ai encore du matériel bien frais.
Merci à vous deux,
Alian