
18-07-2025 23:03
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

16-07-2025 17:34

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

16-01-2023 21:31

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
I think the title's species is a promising candidate, although the spores are maybe a bit wide?
Spore measurements (measured inside asci):
(20.9) 20.93 - 27.3 × 4.2 - 5.46 (5.5) µm
Q = (4.5) 4.52 - 6.55 (6.6) ; N = 5
Me = 24.8 × 4.8 µm ; Qe = 5.2
Do you think I'm right? And if so, which one is the more valid name?

Andy

Thanks,
Andy

Hi Andy,
I am not sure who selected Lasiosphaeria spermoides as current name. In the history of the record it is not given.
I have checked both Hilber & Hilber (2002) as well as your publication from 2004 and updated the records and also added the designated lectotype.
https://www.mycobank.org/MB/373529
Best regards,
Konstanze