Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-11-2020 09:04

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know if the connection between Hyponec

30-10-2020 20:59

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

Growing on wet branch of dead deciduous tree. Exci

01-11-2020 23:15

Dirk Baert

Hallo,Ik heb deze Stemphylium spec. gevonden op de

01-11-2020 21:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,on a dead petiole of Dryopte

01-11-2020 11:34

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, conoce alguno de Ustedes este Anamorfo sobre

01-11-2020 08:56

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

me mandan el material seco,  recolectada posiblem

30-10-2020 13:10

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

Colonies chocolate brown, growing very slowly on a

30-10-2020 23:33

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

Hi! I am wondering if this is Mellitiosporiella s

07-10-2020 23:24

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello,would anyone recognize this nice Hymenoscyph

31-10-2020 09:17

Mirek Gryc

Hello allA friend sent me this collection, we susp

« < 393 394 395 396 397 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop