Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-05-2017 11:44

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, a ver si me pueden ayudar con esta muestra,

05-11-2020 11:16

Jac Gelderblom

Dear friends in a heatherfield (Calluna) on soil

05-11-2020 16:56

Petra Eimann Petra Eimann

Hello, ask for help. Found on 29.11.2019 in a mixe

05-11-2020 18:36

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous, Hi to everyone, J'ai le plaisir

04-11-2020 19:12

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello,this discomycete grew on a dead attached twi

05-11-2020 15:53

Juuso Äikäs

Previously I've thought that a brown cup like this

05-11-2020 15:22

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous, Hi to everyone. Le fascicule 5 d

04-11-2020 09:04

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, he recogido unas muestras sobre Cirsium sp.

04-11-2020 16:57

Unai Fernandes

Hello!I collected this Coprotus in dung of rumina

31-10-2020 22:17

Rubén Martínez-Gil Rubén Martínez-Gil

Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de un pequeño asco

« < 375 376 377 378 379 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop