04-11-2025 09:07
Josep Torres
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
Geopora cervina?
William Slosse,
01-10-2020 21:41
Hello,I found this asco today on the swampy bottom of a dry dune pool. It grew near Salix repens (dwarfism)
Apothecia:
outside covered with tousled hair; sessile; first globose; opening splitted in irregular lobes; max 11mm (unfolded).
Asci:
no blue reaction in Melzer
Spores:
(28.21) 25.17 (23.03) x (17.02) 14.73 (13.27) (N = 18); ellipsoid; smooth; with 1 large oil drop each time.
Could this be Geopora cervina?
Castillo Joseba,
01-10-2020 22:00
Re : Geopora cervina?
Curiosa, si yo la hubuera visto hubiera pensado en Humaria hemisphaerica
Joseba
Joseba
William Slosse,
01-10-2020 22:26
Re : Geopora cervina?
Hola Joseba, the spores de Humaria contienen 2 gotas de aceite y no son suaves en mi opinión.
Castillo Joseba,
01-10-2020 22:29
Re : Geopora cervina?
Noooo e ue no e Humaria, olo te comentaba ue vita macrocopicamente e le parece
Jacky Launoy,
02-10-2020 08:29
Re : Geopora cervina?
William,
Je pense qu'il s'agit de Geopora arenicola.
Je pense qu'il s'agit de Geopora arenicola.
Mirek Gryc,
02-10-2020 09:37
Re : Geopora cervina?
Hello
It is difficult to define the genre in this case because there is no specific study and there are very large discrepancies depending on the author.
However, I would propose to rely on work
Trond Schumacher - Notes on taxonomy, ecology, and distribution of operculate discomycetes (Pezizales) from river banks in Norway.
It is certainly not G. cervina. This genre has more narrow spores.
G. arenicola does not suit me very well either: habitat and dimensions of the ascomat ???
I do not want to suggest anything but I recommend that you read the description of G. tenuis in the quoted work.
It is difficult to define the genre in this case because there is no specific study and there are very large discrepancies depending on the author.
However, I would propose to rely on work
Trond Schumacher - Notes on taxonomy, ecology, and distribution of operculate discomycetes (Pezizales) from river banks in Norway.
It is certainly not G. cervina. This genre has more narrow spores.
G. arenicola does not suit me very well either: habitat and dimensions of the ascomat ???
I do not want to suggest anything but I recommend that you read the description of G. tenuis in the quoted work.
Mirek
William Slosse,
02-10-2020 19:50
Re : Geopora cervina?
Merci pour votre reaction, Jacky.
La différence entre les deux especes n'est effectivement pas simple et se produit entre autre sur la base de la forme des spores. Assez subjectif à mon avis.
And these species were clearly not growing on/in sand but on a muddy mat of rhizomes of Typha latifolia.
Je vais demander de la littérature et approfondir mes connaissances.
Cordialemant,
William
La différence entre les deux especes n'est effectivement pas simple et se produit entre autre sur la base de la forme des spores. Assez subjectif à mon avis.
And these species were clearly not growing on/in sand but on a muddy mat of rhizomes of Typha latifolia.
Je vais demander de la littérature et approfondir mes connaissances.
Cordialemant,
William
William Slosse,
02-10-2020 19:55
Re : Geopora cervina?
thanks for your clarification and literature suggestion, Mirek.
I do not have immediate experience with this genus.
Greets,
William
I do not have immediate experience with this genus.
Greets,
William
William Slosse,
03-10-2020 19:58
Re : Geopora cervina?
Today I made some new shots of the hairs. Do these bring more clarity?
Mirek Gryc,
04-10-2020 07:29
Re : Geopora cervina?
Hi
If you want to compare it with mine. I named them Geopora sp. Because of the dimensions of the spores that do not quite fit Schumacher's description:
If you want to compare it with mine. I named them Geopora sp. Because of the dimensions of the spores that do not quite fit Schumacher's description:
Mirek