13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
13-01-2026 08:43
Danny Newman
Tricladium varicosporioides on indet. decorticate
07-01-2026 22:22
Danny Newman
Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm
13-01-2026 09:10
Danny Newman
Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha
13-01-2026 10:13
Danny Newman
Cordieritidaceae sp. on indet. wood w/ Hypoxylon s
13-01-2026 07:14
Danny Newman
Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S
15-01-2026 10:02
Danny Newman
Coccomyces sp. on fallen Rhododendron leavesPretty
Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 08:29
Bonjour,
récolte sur feuillu, spores 6,5-8,2 x 2,1-2,3 µm. Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Patrice
Patrice
Doc1-0058.pdf
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-01-2020 08:56
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Hi Patrice
great how you took so many free spores. Surely it is, there is only one more important feature to look: the marginal cell size differentiates it from H. subfusispora. From the SBs in the spores I would already exclude it, but to be sure...
About the substrate: it is a decorticated angiosperm branch. Was it on the ground or attached?
Zotto
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 10:52
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
I placed the spore photos next to each other, and then cleaned up.
The marginal cells are small, less than 5 µm (difficult to have correct photos), which seems to go in the direction of H. fusispora, in my opinion like the size of the apothecia which was 2 mm for the largest.
Angiosperm branch was on the ground.
The marginal cells are small, less than 5 µm (difficult to have correct photos), which seems to go in the direction of H. fusispora, in my opinion like the size of the apothecia which was 2 mm for the largest.
Angiosperm branch was on the ground.
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-01-2020 13:25
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Yes I am sure - and amazing!
Cell size excludes subfusispora, so clearly H. fusispora.0
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 13:29
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Thanks Zotto.