27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
26-11-2025 18:13
Jason Karakehian
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
Bonjour,
J'ai récolté cette espèce sur Rubus idaeus en zone alpine pour laquelle je ne trouve pas l'identité . Asques 155_160 x 12-13 Spores 70-75 x 3 µm , paraphyses enroulées x 2µm
Merci de votre aide
Amitiés. Michel
assuming that your spores go up to 100 µm, I checked my database with 50-100 x 2-3.5 µm and found nothing on Rubus, except for Stictis firabilis and S. sulfurea (= S. firabilis), which is certainly not the fungus you found.
Zotto
Interesting, but I would exclude this species because of the "exceedingly slender" spores of hardly 0.75 µm width, small and narrow asci (60-70 x 4) and occurrence in Alabama.
Zotto
Merci Martin and Zotto.
So would I, Zotto, as in Tehon's description for his recombination into Dermascia rubiicola not only spores are that thin (up to 1 µm) but both ends are acute , which is not the case here.
Is there someone studying particularly this group at the moment ?
Michel