27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
26-11-2025 18:13
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
25-11-2025 11:03
Mick PeerdemanHi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so
hymenoschyphus ?
michel hurtu,
24-11-2008 09:19
Je n'arrive à rien avec ce petit asco trouvé dans la boue d'une zone marecageuse, sur petit débrit vegetaux.
2 à 5mm de diamètre, chair molle.
merci de votre aide
le reste suit
amitiés
michel hurtu,
24-11-2008 09:21
michel hurtu,
24-11-2008 09:34
Re:hymenoschyphus ?
voilà, je reste à votre disposition pour tout autre renseignement....(si je peux!)
merci beaucoup
amitiés
michel hurtu
merci beaucoup
amitiés
michel hurtu
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-11-2008 13:58
Re:hymenoschyphus ?
On your last photo the two ascus bases look as being without croziers. That and the strong amyloidity excludes H. monticola. The apical ring looks actually like Pachydisca fulvidula, and I suppose you have this species which is typical of acid bogs and rivulets and quite variable in colour. The VBs in the living paraphyses would be a further criterion.
The species has not been combined in Hymenoscyphus, was far as I remember, and isn't even a typical one.
Zotto
The species has not been combined in Hymenoscyphus, was far as I remember, and isn't even a typical one.
Zotto
michel hurtu,
24-11-2008 17:07
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-11-2008 17:55
Re:hymenoschyphus ?
yeah, that's good. Exactly. So I am sure about fulvidula. In contrast, H. epiphyllus would be multiguttulate to the very base of paraphysis, but H. monticola has guttules similar as fulvidula.
Zotto
Zotto
michel hurtu,
24-11-2008 19:03
Re:hymenoschyphus ?
Ok, thank you very much !
michel hurtu
michel hurtu






