25-02-2019 12:00
Bernard CLESSELa microscopie me semble identique à celle de l'a
25-02-2019 12:03
Bernard CLESSEJe pense déjà avoir observé au microscope cet a
25-02-2019 12:28
Bernard CLESSEJe suppose que c'est bien ça mais un avis expéri
23-02-2019 18:01
Per MarstadI have found this to-day, in Norway.Asci 125x17.Sp
24-02-2019 01:38
Viktorie HalasuHello forum, I have a question about Starbäck's
Was the substate exposed, a still-attached branch? Or on the moist gorund?
The MLZ reaction of hairs and exciple is used in Huhtinen's key as a character but one must know that it is not at all shown in Lugol.
Thanks a lot for your messages!
I should have mentioned that, actually these are collections from the Suffolk (Brandon, UK). I am in Cambridge for work at the moment, that is why I do not have access to my usual microscope and reagents.
I will try my best to save some samples for further observations on rehydrated samples (still better than nothing I guess) when I am back to France.
I can confirm this was coniferous wood (picture enclosed). It was on the ground, and quite rotten already. Thanks for the tip regarding the use of Melzer vs Lugol for reaction with hairs, I was not aware of that.
I will go back there and see if I can collect older specimens to do more observations, including a more careful look at the resin and to measure hairs.
Cheers,
Edouard