Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-01-2026 10:24

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

07-01-2026 22:22

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

07-01-2026 17:29

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

07-01-2026 10:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

06-01-2026 20:54

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous et meilleurs voeux pour cette nouv

02-01-2026 17:43

MARICEL PATINO

Hi there, although I couldn't see the fruitbody, I

04-01-2026 17:45

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

I was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which

02-01-2026 22:48

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je profite de cette nouvelle demand

02-01-2026 19:35

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,First of all, my best wishes

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
On Horse dung
Elsa Sousa, 08-02-2019 00:10
Good evening,

Woul you please help me with this?

Spores lemoniform ± 24.2 x 17.1 measured withou the appendage (one app.)

On horse dung.
Thank you.

Regards,
Elsa
  • message #56209
  • message #56209
  • message #56209
  • message #56209
  • message #56209
  • message #56209
Peter Püwert, 08-02-2019 13:46
Peter Püwert
Re : On Horse dung
Hi Elsa,

the photos are not suitable to determine a species. However, I suppose a Schizothecium, conicum perhaps. To the nearer determination the "hairs" on the neck and the outside of the perithecium must be also examined.

Greetings Peter.
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
  • message #56210
Norbert Heine, 08-02-2019 22:17
Norbert Heine
Re : On Horse dung
Hello Elsa,

I don't believe in Schizothecium conicum.

For that, the spores are too short and too broad.

Maybe Schizothecium miniglutinans or squamulosum.

I prever the first one.

But, like Peter said, we need more informations (hairs, pedicel etc.) for determination.

Regards, Norbert