21-02-2014 16:19
Eduard OsieckOn a small Fraxinus branch under the bark whitish
12-03-2014 20:57
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good nightI had this collection like C. granulifor
26-02-2014 22:16
Ralph Vandiest
Hello,I found this species on heracleum. Size 0,
16-03-2014 13:39
Enrique Rubio
HI to all I'm looking for B. Hein's article on Wi
09-03-2014 12:32
Javier Ormad
Hola a todos!Os presento este posible anamorfo sob
14-03-2014 22:40
Javier Ormad
¡Hola a todos!Apotecios intradérmicos foliares,
14-03-2014 15:34
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour,récolte réalisée à l'interieur d'une
14-03-2014 14:40
Enrique Rubio
Hi to all I'd like to know your opinion about thi
13-03-2014 12:27
Björn Wergen
Hi there,does anybody have the article from Shoema
Sur tige morte de Juncus (à 2'300 m), apothécies 0.15 - 0.3 mm de diamètre, l'hyménium ocre, asques octosporés, 85 - 105 x 8 - 11µm, IKI+, spores hyalines, biguttulées, 7 - 10 x 3 - 3.5 µm, paraphyses renflées au sommet, réfringentes.
Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Elisabeth
das schaut nach einer Hysterostegiella aus. Aber in meiner Datenbank haben alle richtige Hysterostegiellas kleinere Sporen mit max. 1,5-2 µm Breite. Auch die großen Sporenguttulen wären untypisch für due Gattung.
Eher denke ich noch an Trochila, aber an Monokotylen?
Gruß
Zotto
I overlooked that Hysterostegiella has lanceolate paraphyses. Spores of Hysteropezizella pusilla are similar but larger: 10-13 x 2.5-4 in Defago p. 23, and with much smaller oil drops (Fig. 4b). There is also no lid (Fig. 7).
In the synonymy in Species Fungorum is perhaps an error: Allantophomopsis pusilla with the same author (Libert).
Zotto