Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-11-2009 22:22

Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Bonne nuit, Voir si vous m'avez élaguée appor

07-12-2015 14:17

Zugna Marino Zugna Marino

Buon giorno a tutti, ad un primo momento, non ess

25-11-2012 20:32

Bometon Javier Bometon Javier

Ascomas cupoliformes abiertos lateralmente, himeni

25-01-2026 16:08

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Massariosphaeria alpigena vs. Pseudomassariosphaeria grandispora
Gernot Friebes, 06-03-2018 15:30
Hi,

here I have a species that seems very close to P. grandispora but I am not certain how to distinguish it from M. alpigena (Lophiostoma alpigenum). In the literature these species are rarely compared to each other which makes things difficult. 

-) Leuchtman (1984) only treats M. grandispora without mentioning M. alpigena.
-) Tanaka & Harada (2004) compare M. alpigena to their newly described species M. megaspora but unfortunately not to P./M. grandispora, which is morphologically probably more similar to M. alpigena.
-) The key in Holm & Holm (1988) does contain both M. alpigena and M. grandispora, but they also mention that M. grandispora might be a synonym of M alpigena. Their description of "Massariosphaeria cfr. grandispora" gives fairly short ascospores of only 32–36 µm in length, thus close to the measurements given in Tanaka & Harada 2004. Leuchtman (1984) gives a much wider range of 33–50 µm, which would include the measurements of M. alpigena in Holm & Holm (1988).
-) Chesters & Bell (1970) only treat M. alpigena (as Lophiostoma alpigenum) without mentioning M. grandispora.

The material that I have at hand grows on Clematis vitalba, which might be in the host range of either species... The ascospores generally have 10–11 septa, a very thick sheath in water, partly slightly fusoid end cells and measure about 43–52 x 7.8–9 µm. Depending on which literature I use I could identify it either as M. alpigena or M. grandispora (now transferred to the genus Pseudomassariosphaeria).

What are your thoughts on this topic? Is there any newer literature that I might have missed?

Best wishes,
Gernot
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614
  • message #52614