Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-03-2026 19:29

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,On March 4, 2026, I found th

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

05-03-2026 16:30

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, On the 2nd of February 2026,

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

03-03-2026 20:34

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningThese small, amphora-shaped perithecia

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

02-03-2026 22:07

Jorge Hernanz

Buenas noches!Entre musgos, bajo Pinus halepensis

01-03-2026 18:02

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this mystery Helotiales on an incubated le

28-02-2026 14:43

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

A new refrence desired :Svanidze, T.V. (1984) Novy

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia agg ramealis
Viktorie Halasu, 22-06-2017 08:59
Viktorie HalasuHello, 
I'd like to ask for your help with this Mollisia. With A.Gminder's key I arrived to no.40, but neither M. ventosa nor M. ramealis fit completely.

On water-soaked wood in a brook between spruce and beech forests, 620 m a.s.l. Apothecia cca 2 mm in diam., isolated to densely fasciculate.
Sp. 0-septate, OCI cca 4,
Croziers+, IKI+ bb,
KOH- (ectal excipulum turns greenish brown, but no visible pigment)
Paraphyses with long VBs
Medúlla = t. intricata, without those big crystals of M. ramealis (can they be present only in some apothecia?)
Ectal exc. = t. angularis, elongated cells 90° to surface, dark brown.

Thank you for any advice.
Viktorie 
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
  • message #49365
Hans-Otto Baral, 22-06-2017 20:37
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia agg ramealis
Actually the spores of M. ventosa should rarely exceed 3 µm, but I see that Breitenbach & Kränzlin gave 2.5-3.5, and I would not hesitate to say M. ventosa to your sample. What else differs?

M. ramealis I would exclude, it has spores much over 20 µm long and an ectal excipulum at the margin running under an oblique angle, not vertical.

Yes, crystals are typical of M. ramealis, which does not belong at all in Mollisia.
Zotto
Viktorie Halasu, 22-06-2017 21:24
Viktorie Halasu
Re : Mollisia agg ramealis
Thank you, Zotto.

Andreas wrote in his key, that ventosa should often have 1-3septate spores. I only saw one dead 1septate spore in the preparate. 

Hans-Otto Baral, 22-06-2017 21:31
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia agg ramealis
This depends on the abundance of overmature spores. Freshly ejected spores are always non-septate in M. ventosa.
Viktorie Halasu, 22-06-2017 21:36
Viktorie Halasu
Re : Mollisia agg ramealis
Ah so.
Thank you very much.