Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

14-05-2026 05:36

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I haven't paid much attention to Lachnu

11-05-2026 12:32

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Pourriez-vous m'aider à identifier cette héloti

13-05-2026 15:26

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Voici une récolte faite il y a quelques j

12-05-2026 15:41

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Dear Ascolovers, especially interested in Pezizale

13-05-2026 12:05

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,J'aimerais avoir confirmation de c

10-05-2026 23:17

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for

28-04-2026 20:07

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... on twig in the air at standing Ceratonia siliq

27-04-2026 20:52

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

Found on hanging tiwg of Olea europaea in dried-ou

11-05-2026 20:22

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on attached twig of standing Ficus caricaquite uns

11-05-2026 13:22

Sylvie Le Goff

BonjourPuis avoir votre avis sur cet ascome, je vo

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer, 07-01-2017 22:23
Bonsoir,

je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:

> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)

> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)

> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)

Qui peut m'aider?

Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 00:13
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 10:25
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.

See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."

This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer, 08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 16:20
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.

Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 17:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...