Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer, 07-01-2017 22:23
Bonsoir,

je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:

> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)

> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)

> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)

Qui peut m'aider?

Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 00:13
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 10:25
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.

See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."

This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer, 08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 16:20
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.

Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 17:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...