05-02-2026 15:07
Found on a fallen needle of Pinus halepensis, diam
05-02-2026 06:43
Stefan BlaserHello everybody, Any help on this one would be mu
18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
02-02-2026 14:55
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome
02-02-2026 14:33
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne
31-01-2026 10:22
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les
02-02-2026 09:29
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pour cette récolte de 2

... found on wood of Fagus sylvatica (without any algae) in the Bavarian forest.
The small asci are thick-walled and react with IKI strongly blue - but not the wall, but the inside of the ascus.
Who has an idea of this fungus?
Best regards from Lothar
the blue reaction is the tholus of the ascus, the thickened ascus wall which is much thinner in living asci.
I can hardly believe your scale, such minute lichen asci I never heard or saw.
Zotto
Hi Zotto,
I am also somewhat bewildered that I find so many fungi with minute asci and spores (H. hemiamyloideus, the pyrenomycete, and this disco). But my scale should be o.k., as other fungi like for instance Flammulaster, Entoloma or Mollisia (possibly I will post one soon) have "normal" results.
My fungus, by the way, is no lichen. There are no traces of algae on the substrate, nor in the apothecia. It is related to lichens, o.k. - but no lichen.
Thank you and best regards from Lothar
... sorry, I do not have a 60x-objective. I have used the cut-function in my BMS-program, but also have similar results with the smaller spores on larger pictures without cut. And Hyphodiscus has realistic measures - or not? And - the asci and spores were definitely very small.
Regards from Lothar
... oh shit ... - sorry!
I see the cut-function brings a false result when measuring the fotos taken by it - what a shit!
So - Zotto is, as almost in every case - right.
The measures are too small.
I give an original picture with - hopefully - more realistic values.
Regards from Lothar - and sorry again
P.S. The same mistake is likely in my pyrenomycete post. I will go back to this later.




