17-09-2014 08:05
Blasco Rafael
Hola. les parece que estas muestras puedan ser Hya
17-09-2014 03:33
Masanori KutsunaHello everyone, According to some literatures (Den
16-09-2014 21:28
Eduard OsieckThis white-spored Hypocrea was found on an unusua
15-09-2014 11:24
Marja PennanenHello forum,I collected some myxos on a leaf falle
15-09-2014 16:59
Blasco Rafael
Hola, estas muestras les parece que son Incrucipul
15-09-2014 18:00
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybody These very small yellowish, scatt
11-09-2014 09:07
Blasco Rafael
Hola, this Muestra de no pensaba hacer micrófotog
17-08-2014 13:10
Rubén Martínez-Gil
Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de una Pulvinula qu
nom.prov.
Malcolm Greaves,
18-07-2016 12:16
I found a group of Scutellinia heterosphaera nom.prov. the other day and I was wondering if/when this species has/will be described and loose its nom.prov. status? Is there a time limit on how long it can remain in this state? I think it was Beñat and Neven who put the name forward the name but they both seem to have "dissapeared" certainly from this forum for quite some time.Mal
Chris Yeates,
18-07-2016 17:57
Re : nom.prov.
Hi Malcolm
as I understand it the status of a nom. prov. lies outside the ICBN rules http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php and therefore there won't be a time limit on it.
Anyone who is a regular on ASCOFrance will be familiar with people finding what are probably new and undescribed species. A provisional name gives at least a handle to further work on a taxon. If the finder or expert in the group has given it such a name one can also call it Xxxxxx xxxx Author ined.
I suspect that the modern way will increasingly be that new species are not formally described without sequencing; that will presumably add to the inevitable backlog.
It actually doesn't need to be too much of a problem really - thank heavens for the 'nom. prov.' system.
I shudder to think how many nom. prov's Zotto has got(!) but I would be the last person to put a time limit on him . . . . .
best wishes
Chris
as I understand it the status of a nom. prov. lies outside the ICBN rules http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php and therefore there won't be a time limit on it.
Anyone who is a regular on ASCOFrance will be familiar with people finding what are probably new and undescribed species. A provisional name gives at least a handle to further work on a taxon. If the finder or expert in the group has given it such a name one can also call it Xxxxxx xxxx Author ined.
I suspect that the modern way will increasingly be that new species are not formally described without sequencing; that will presumably add to the inevitable backlog.
It actually doesn't need to be too much of a problem really - thank heavens for the 'nom. prov.' system.
I shudder to think how many nom. prov's Zotto has got(!) but I would be the last person to put a time limit on him . . . . .
best wishes
Chris
Malcolm Greaves,
18-07-2016 23:23
Re : nom.prov.
Thanks for the info Chris.
Mal
Mal