Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-12-2025 18:07

Margot en Geert Vullings

These plumes were found on rotten wood.They strong

18-12-2025 17:23

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c

17-12-2025 18:35

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous/Hi to everyone I am passing along

21-11-2025 10:47

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Peut-être Mollisia palustris ?Trouvée su

15-12-2025 15:48

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Melanospora cf. lagenaria on old, rotting, fallen

15-12-2025 15:54

Johan Boonefaes Johan Boonefaes

Unknown anamorph found on the ground in coastal sa

15-12-2025 21:11

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

Small clavate hairs, negative croziers and IKI bb

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

15-12-2025 21:47

Pol Debaenst

Good evening, On 12/11/2025 I found ascomycetes w

15-12-2025 07:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.