Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-06-2026 19:45

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good afternoonI'm completely baffled by this suppo

03-06-2026 21:37

Tony Cumberlidge

This is my second post so just starting to get use

03-06-2026 14:39

Thomas Flammer

Apothecia yellow, glassy-transparent, 80 - 120 ymS

02-05-2016 17:12

Gilles Corriol Gilles Corriol

Bonjour à tous,Suivant le conseil de Nicolas VV,

12-02-2013 01:36

Renée Lebeuf

Bonjour, J'aurais de nouveau besoin de votre aide

16-03-2014 13:39

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

HI to all I'm looking for B. Hein's article on Wi

02-06-2026 14:33

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a PDF copy of the followin

03-06-2026 08:21

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourRécolté le 17/05/2026Sur un chemin, terre

18-10-2022 00:12

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola amigos/asRecientemente encontré esta colecci

02-06-2026 17:58

Louis DENY

Bonjour forum, Sur feuille de Populus tremula, en

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.