Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-02-2026 01:14

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello!How would you name this species? Most perith

04-08-2014 17:35

Leandro Sánchez Leandro Sánchez

Sur branche de feuillus, jusqu'à 22 mm diamètre,

05-02-2026 15:07

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found on a fallen needle of Pinus halepensis, diam

05-02-2026 06:43

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, Any help on this one would be mu

18-08-2025 15:07

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i

02-02-2026 21:46

Margot en Geert Vullings

On a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs

02-02-2026 14:55

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome

02-02-2026 14:33

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne

31-01-2026 10:22

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les

02-02-2026 09:29

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pour cette récolte de 2

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.