
13-05-2019 22:25

Hello, Found by Willy Heimeriks, April 2019, The

12-05-2019 20:53

Hello, today we searched for ascos in a wet mount

12-05-2019 19:13
Lepista ZacariasI was consulting the database of AscoFrance and I

11-05-2019 13:49
I have long been interested about fungi of peat bo

12-05-2019 19:06

Condia is 12-14x 3-4 um, hyalin. Setae is up to 6

06-05-2019 15:14
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,On carex (probably C. acutiformis

09-05-2019 23:24

Hello, this Orbilia was growing on a laying branc

I am posting some images
In particular I wish to learn what are the large cushion-shaped structures with a wide opening or circular shape at the apex posted in the last pic.

Sporangiophores: 40-45 x 14-18um (n=3)
Sporangia 16-20um (n=17)
Oogonia not observed ?? (are they present in young pustules or produced and present in a much mature stages , eg in old infected leaves?)

Well, this is an off topic. This forum is for Ascomycetes (only).
But to give you an answer:
A. candida is restricted to Brassicacae.
Your "fungus" probably is Albugo ipomoeae-panduratae.
And about the cushion-like structures - their are glandular trichomes.
All the best

See Choi D, Priest MJ, 1995. A key to the genus Albugo. Mycotaxon 53:
261–272. for a key.
Although it should be borne in mind that Voglmayr & Riethmüller "Phylogenetic relationships of Albugo species (white blister rusts) based on LSU rDNA sequence and oospore data" in Mycological Research 110 (2006) pp. 75-85
comment ". . . .it should be noted that a taxonomic revision of the Albugo species from Convolvulaceae is badly needed; the oospore morphology especially, which represents a prime character for the distinction of the species of this group, should be re-investigated. This is particularly difficult as the oospores are not produced in the leaves but in distorted stems, which are only rarely collected."
regards
Chris

Million thanks for your info, explanations, and extract. I was happy that I got to know those structure are glandular trichomes. In fact I noted that they had the same aperture size as the base of a normal trichome, but never thought of glandular hairs (will research as soon as I finish this post). I agree with the ID (I was considering this as first ID yesterday after seeing spronagia of this species online matching with mine). I've also got a reason why I have not seen Oospores ;-)
P.s. Are Oomycetes not water mould => fungi?
Case solved, thanks