21-02-2020 14:47
Dragiša SavicHi to all, I need help identifying this lichenicol
21-02-2020 11:48
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour / Hi to everyone Le 1er numéro 2020 d'As
14-02-2020 18:19
Charles Aron
Hello everyone. My first contribution to the forum
13-02-2020 00:11
Hola.Imágenes tomadas el 2 de Febrero en la Repú
16-02-2020 18:00
Hola.Especie fotografiada el 29 de Septiembre de 2
17-02-2020 21:25
Do you have some idea on this fungus with scutate
18-02-2020 08:53
Hi forum, Have either of you ever observed the te
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf