19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
19-03-2026 19:34
Filip Fuljer
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
19-03-2026 17:50
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
18-03-2026 17:22
Katarina PastircakovaHi there,I'm looking for the following literature:
19-03-2026 10:56
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643
27-02-2026 11:21
Yannick Mourgues
Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat
Please, read the attached pdf.
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both