10-06-2026 10:45
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui
08-06-2026 10:16
Spooren Marco
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
10-06-2026 09:24
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do
09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
08-06-2026 17:00
François BartholomeeusenGood day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de
07-06-2026 15:10
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco
05-06-2026 11:02
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596691
07-06-2026 12:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici une brève description de ce qui m
07-06-2026 12:43
Steve ClementsBojour. This was a strange find on a stick on my
Please, read the attached pdf.
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both