Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

21-12-2025 12:34

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España) 

20-12-2025 23:08

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonsoir, récolte sur sol sablonneux dans l'arriÃ

21-12-2025 09:32

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny ascomycete found embedded in wood in

21-12-2025 01:54

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,Would it be possible to find the species with t

20-12-2025 15:47

Mirek Gryc

Hi.These grew on pine wood that was heavily covere

20-12-2025 10:49

Mirek Gryc

Hi. „I doubt it is possible to identify this ti

18-12-2025 21:17

Pol Debaenst

The identification took me to Byssonectria deformi

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

19-12-2025 10:10

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte réalisée en milieu dunaire, a

18-12-2025 17:23

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Disco on Carex pendula
Chris Yeates, 07-06-2015 19:37
Chris YeatesBonsoir tous
this fungus was collected in good condition on damp dead leaves of Carex pendula. Shortly stiped (up to half disc diameter).
* Pale cream hymenium (no hint of reddening with age - this was collected a week ago).
* Hairs roughened; in the lower part often filled with very distinctive globose VB's
* Asci BB, without croziers; occasionally with one to three "Psilachnum guttules".
* Spores narrowly clavate, with a few small oil droplets; 8.5-10.2 x 1.9-2.2µm.

Any suggestions very welcome
Cordialement
Chris
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
  • message #36404
Andreas Gminder, 07-06-2015 19:43
Andreas Gminder
Re : Disco on Carex pendula

Hello Chris,


why is it not Lachnum caricis?


best regards,


Andreas

Chris Yeates, 07-06-2015 20:45
Chris Yeates
Re : Disco on Carex pendula
Hallo Andreas
A species I have not collected before - at the time I was working on it the only descriptions I had (of Dasyscypha/Dasyscyphus caricis) were in Dennis (1949) and Ellis and Ellis I. Spore measurements and shape were not quite right and Cubby was unavailable so I could not check against Zotto's files.
I can see that the Dennis and Ellis descriptions were almost certainly from dried/dead material - hence the discrepancies. Zotto's HB 8563 is a very good match indeed, with all the characters I mentioned shown. The guttules in the paraphyses and (especially) in the proximal part of many of the hairs are very distinctive - I attach a couple more images of the hairs.

Very many thanks for your (very quick) response, Andreas.
  • message #36408
  • message #36408