
30-06-2025 14:45

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

30-06-2025 12:09

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 16:56
Lydia KoelmansPlease can anyone tell me the species name of the

30-06-2025 06:57
Ethan CrensonHi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

29-06-2025 18:11
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend found this disco yesterday in

28-06-2025 16:00
Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

27-06-2025 14:09
Åge OterhalsI found this pyrenomycetous fungi in mountain area
there is some uncertainty with identification of this species.
Large spores of this specimen coincide only with one species in Stomiopeltis (S. betula) though the host differs (Luttrell, 1946; Ellis, 1977). There is a species described from Ledum (S. ledi), but it has much smaller spores (Remler, 1979). It could be possible to consider S. versicolor as well, which also was collected on Rhodod. hirsutum. But it was later transferred to Microthyrium and in "British fungi keys" mentioned with spore appendages. Therefore i inclined to S. betula. Probably you will have other suggestions?
Nina.
Thyriothecia scattered on upper leaf side (fallen leaves of Andromeda polifolia), dark brown, 150-200 mk in diameter, with visible pore.
Scutellum from irregular lobed cells, in some ascocarps (probably later in development) cells to the edge become more elongate and radially arranged; asci 37–44 x 8–10 mk; pseudoparaphyses filiform, about 1.5 mk broad; spores fusoid, with many oils, slightly heteropolar, with one weak septa, some curved, 15 (13–18) x 3.2 (2.5–3.9) mk (n=23, measurements in dead state).

I only know S. betulae on Betula on which it is very common here. My measurements are always towards the top of the range given by Pamela Ellis - see attached image. I think your measurements are too small for S. betulae - perhaps you have an undescribed taxon. Do you have any macro-images?
Cordialement
Chris
thank you for showing me S. betulae. It looks more robust, and yes, spores in my specimen are smaller. I did not make macro-photos because it is barely seen by naked eye, very scattered dots on leaves, better to use lens for them ). I will collect more material of this group to make clear picture later, now will left it under-identified.