Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

21-11-2025 15:22

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found in moss, forest with Pinus halepensis. Dime

21-11-2025 10:47

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Peut-être Mollisia palustris ?Trouvée su

21-11-2025 10:50

Mirek Gryc

Hello Please help me identify this little asco.It

21-11-2025 11:52

Jean-Luc Ranger

Bonjour à tous, on voit toujours 2 espèces areni

21-11-2025 10:56

Christopher Engelhardt Christopher Engelhardt

Very small (~0,5 mm) white ascos, found yesterday

29-06-2016 18:06

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonjour,Trouvé sur branches mortes cortiquées de

14-11-2025 16:26

Marian Jagers Marian Jagers

Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius

17-11-2025 21:46

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois pourrissant de feuillu

20-11-2025 14:14

Mick Peerdeman

Found on the leaves of 'Juglans regia' in the Neth

20-11-2025 13:07

Mick Peerdeman

In January i found these black markings on the dea

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Wettsteinina? on Eriophorum angustifolium
Marcus Yeo, 29-07-2014 20:54

I found this bitunicate ascomycete growing on dead leaves of Eriophorum angustifolium.


Pseudothecia are immersed, ca 100-150 µm diam


Asci are bitunicate, ovoid, 8-spored, 38-57 x 22-29 µm (only 2 asci measured). Sometimes immature and post-mature asci are present in the same pseudothecium.


Spores are mostly 22-25 x 5-6(-7) µm, in one sample rather larger (<31 µm long). They are 1-septate, slightly constricted at septum, and sometimes splitting at the septum into 2 parts. Spores are hyaline, becoming dark brown when old, with 2 large oil bodies/cell when fresh, and with a thick gelatinous sheath. The spore wall appears to be minutely verruculose in old spores.


I think it belongs in the Pseudosphaeriaceae. I had wondered about Monascostroma innumerosum but the thick gelatinous spore sheath seems to rule out this species and suggests Wettsteinina. The closest fit in Shoemaker & Babcock's 1987 paper on Wettsteinina is probably W. junci, but the description doesn't fit in all respects, e.g. spore dimensions are given as 26-31 x 9-11 µm (i.e. rather larger than in my specimen). Another possibility is W. waltraudae, described by Scheuer and not included in Shoemaker & Babcock.


I'd be grateful for any suggestions.


Thanks


Marcus

  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514