Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

15-12-2025 21:47

Pol Debaenst

Good evening, On 12/11/2025 I found ascomycetes w

15-12-2025 21:11

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

Small clavate hairs, negative croziers and IKI bb

15-12-2025 15:54

Johan Boonefaes Johan Boonefaes

Unknown anamorph found on the ground in coastal sa

15-12-2025 15:48

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Melanospora cf. lagenaria on old, rotting, fallen

15-12-2025 07:05

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb

15-12-2025 11:49

Danny Newman Danny Newman

ITS sequences from the following two collections B

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

15-12-2025 12:34

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rhytismataceae on oak leafnear Purchase Roa

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

13-12-2025 17:26

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone,I have a rather interesting ascomyc

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Wettsteinina? on Eriophorum angustifolium
Marcus Yeo, 29-07-2014 20:54

I found this bitunicate ascomycete growing on dead leaves of Eriophorum angustifolium.


Pseudothecia are immersed, ca 100-150 µm diam


Asci are bitunicate, ovoid, 8-spored, 38-57 x 22-29 µm (only 2 asci measured). Sometimes immature and post-mature asci are present in the same pseudothecium.


Spores are mostly 22-25 x 5-6(-7) µm, in one sample rather larger (<31 µm long). They are 1-septate, slightly constricted at septum, and sometimes splitting at the septum into 2 parts. Spores are hyaline, becoming dark brown when old, with 2 large oil bodies/cell when fresh, and with a thick gelatinous sheath. The spore wall appears to be minutely verruculose in old spores.


I think it belongs in the Pseudosphaeriaceae. I had wondered about Monascostroma innumerosum but the thick gelatinous spore sheath seems to rule out this species and suggests Wettsteinina. The closest fit in Shoemaker & Babcock's 1987 paper on Wettsteinina is probably W. junci, but the description doesn't fit in all respects, e.g. spore dimensions are given as 26-31 x 9-11 µm (i.e. rather larger than in my specimen). Another possibility is W. waltraudae, described by Scheuer and not included in Shoemaker & Babcock.


I'd be grateful for any suggestions.


Thanks


Marcus

  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514