Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

13-09-2025 14:10

Wim de Groot

We found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.

13-09-2025 15:43

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour Christian,J'ai trouvé deux spores ressemb

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

13-09-2025 14:01

Thomas Flammer

dark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 23:53

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

10-09-2025 17:18

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

07-09-2025 08:19

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

09-09-2025 12:07

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour amis mycologues,Trouvé sur moquette de ch

08-09-2025 19:07

ruiz Jose

Hola me pasan esta recolecta en madera de fraxinus

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Wettsteinina? on Eriophorum angustifolium
Marcus Yeo, 29-07-2014 20:54

I found this bitunicate ascomycete growing on dead leaves of Eriophorum angustifolium.


Pseudothecia are immersed, ca 100-150 µm diam


Asci are bitunicate, ovoid, 8-spored, 38-57 x 22-29 µm (only 2 asci measured). Sometimes immature and post-mature asci are present in the same pseudothecium.


Spores are mostly 22-25 x 5-6(-7) µm, in one sample rather larger (<31 µm long). They are 1-septate, slightly constricted at septum, and sometimes splitting at the septum into 2 parts. Spores are hyaline, becoming dark brown when old, with 2 large oil bodies/cell when fresh, and with a thick gelatinous sheath. The spore wall appears to be minutely verruculose in old spores.


I think it belongs in the Pseudosphaeriaceae. I had wondered about Monascostroma innumerosum but the thick gelatinous spore sheath seems to rule out this species and suggests Wettsteinina. The closest fit in Shoemaker & Babcock's 1987 paper on Wettsteinina is probably W. junci, but the description doesn't fit in all respects, e.g. spore dimensions are given as 26-31 x 9-11 µm (i.e. rather larger than in my specimen). Another possibility is W. waltraudae, described by Scheuer and not included in Shoemaker & Babcock.


I'd be grateful for any suggestions.


Thanks


Marcus

  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514