19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
19-03-2026 19:34
Filip Fuljer
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
19-03-2026 17:50
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
18-03-2026 17:22
Katarina PastircakovaHi there,I'm looking for the following literature:
19-03-2026 10:56
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643
27-02-2026 11:21
Yannick Mourgues
Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat
Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:01
I'm looking for an article again, this time:
Boonmee, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chomnunti, P.; Chukeatirote, E.; Tsui, C.K.M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Hyde, K.D. 2011. Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal Diversity. 51:63-102
Maybe someone here has access to this paper?
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
16-05-2014 16:09
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Done!
Andy
Andy
Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:36
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Andy,
That was quick, thanks a lot!
By the way, I recently remembered that I sent you a few collections of Acanthostigma cf. septoconstrictum from Austria and Germany a few years ago. Now I was just wondering if you could tell me briefly if you were able to sequence them succesfully or if it was not possible to get to any conclusive result.
Best wishes,
Gernot
That was quick, thanks a lot!
By the way, I recently remembered that I sent you a few collections of Acanthostigma cf. septoconstrictum from Austria and Germany a few years ago. Now I was just wondering if you could tell me briefly if you were able to sequence them succesfully or if it was not possible to get to any conclusive result.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
16-05-2014 16:41
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Gernot,
Yes, I attempted to sequence one of your three specimens and it turned out to be something in the Ceratosphaeriaceae sensu lato. I will be back in the lab next month and will try the other collections.
Best,
Andy
Yes, I attempted to sequence one of your three specimens and it turned out to be something in the Ceratosphaeriaceae sensu lato. I will be back in the lab next month and will try the other collections.
Best,
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:48
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Oh, that's interesting - and unexpected! Will be interesting to see where the other collections belong.
Thanks again and best wishes,
Gernot
Thanks again and best wishes,
Gernot
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 14:08
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Andy,
I just wanted to ask if you have any new results regarding the remaining two Acanthostigma collections.
Thank you and best wishes,
Gernot
I just wanted to ask if you have any new results regarding the remaining two Acanthostigma collections.
Thank you and best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
05-12-2014 16:28
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Dear Gernot,
Yes, I did sequence the 2nd specimen of Acanthostigma septoconstrictum and the results from GenBank are below. The 3rd specimen did not have enough ascomata to sequence. The 1st specimen resulted in a contaminate. These tiny tiny ascomata are difficult to sequence.
BLASTs to Saccharata and Macrophomina in GenBank. 25-Jun-2014 (Eukaryota; Fungi; Dikarya; Ascomycota; Pezizomycotina; Dothideomycetes; Dothideomycetes incertae sedis; Botryosphaeriales;Saccharataceae; Saccharata)
Unfortunately, I am afraid that I am not familiar with Saccharata, but the sequence should have resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best,
Andy
Yes, I did sequence the 2nd specimen of Acanthostigma septoconstrictum and the results from GenBank are below. The 3rd specimen did not have enough ascomata to sequence. The 1st specimen resulted in a contaminate. These tiny tiny ascomata are difficult to sequence.
BLASTs to Saccharata and Macrophomina in GenBank. 25-Jun-2014 (Eukaryota; Fungi; Dikarya; Ascomycota; Pezizomycotina; Dothideomycetes; Dothideomycetes incertae sedis; Botryosphaeriales;Saccharataceae; Saccharata)
Unfortunately, I am afraid that I am not familiar with Saccharata, but the sequence should have resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best,
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 17:46
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Dear Andy,
thank you for sharing the results! Too bad neither sequence has resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
05-12-2014 18:03
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
If there is any way for you to culture these little guys, then I would be happy to try to sequence them from the cultures. The anamorphs are very cool!
Andy
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 18:25
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
I might indeed have the possibility to try a few cultures, although I don't have access to the appropriate professional facilities so it's always a bit of a gamble to get good cultures. But with a bit of luck it might work. If it does, I will gladly come back to your offer!
Best wishes,
Gernot
Best wishes,
Gernot