17-01-2026 19:35
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich suche zu Cosmospora aurantiicola Lite
15-01-2026 15:55
Lothar Krieglsteiner
this one is especially interesting for me because
16-01-2026 00:45
Ethan CrensonHi all, On decorticated hardwood from a New York
18-01-2026 12:24
Josep Torres
Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
Little "tongues"
Dragiša Savic,
23-04-2014 11:55
Björn Wergen,
23-04-2014 20:11
Re : Little "tongues"
Hi,
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
Andrew N. Miller,
23-04-2014 21:37
Re : Little "tongues"
Looks like an old Rhytidhysteron to me.
Andy
Andy
Christian Lechat,
23-04-2014 21:43
Re : Little "tongues"
I think it is not a fungus
Chr1stian
Chr1stian
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 08:17
Re : Little "tongues"
Thank you all but I guess I'll have to look for her again.
Alain GARDIENNET,
24-04-2014 13:59
Re : Little "tongues"
Probably a single vertical cut would have give an information. I agree with Andy but we have too much little informations.
What is the substrate ?
Alain
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 14:57
Re : Little "tongues"
The substrate is Fagus sylvatica. They were completely rotten and attached to a tree on one side, so I called them tongues. I've never seen Rhytidhysteron and Hysterographium on photos look same but it is much smaller, I found him (http://www.naturefg.com/pages/b-fungi/hysterographium% 20flexuosum.htm)