Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

14-01-2026 10:02

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, These ascomycetes were growing on standing

13-01-2026 10:13

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Cordieritidaceae sp. on indet. wood w/ Hypoxylon s

13-01-2026 07:57

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Bombardia on indet. decorticate woodAppalachia

14-01-2026 07:28

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Nemania sp. on indet. decorticate woodAppalachian

12-01-2026 22:02

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins

11-01-2026 20:35

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely

13-01-2026 18:55

Rees Cronce

Strossmayeria sp. on indet. decroticate hardwoodTh

13-01-2026 07:28

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe

13-01-2026 07:14

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S

13-01-2026 09:10

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana