Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

10-02-2026 18:54

Erik Van Dijk

Does anyone has an idea what fungus species this m

09-02-2026 20:10

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2

09-02-2026 14:46

Anna Klos

Goedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti

09-02-2026 11:42

Ã…ge Oterhals

Hi forum, I found this Lachnum on old hardwood tw

02-02-2026 21:46

Margot en Geert Vullings

On a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson, 14-09-2012 13:49
Hello Everyone,

I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.

There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.

Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat, 14-09-2012 14:07
Christian Lechat
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg

Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti, 14-09-2012 15:31
Alessio Pierotti
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
  • message #19737