21-05-2024 11:33
Nihad OmerovicHello,found on dead, dry, attached (and fallen) tw
07-11-2018 08:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello, could someone send this publication to me
21-05-2024 17:48
Karl Soler KinnerbäckHi all,Could this be Venturioscypha or Venturiocis
21-05-2024 09:15
Pierre RepellinBonjour à tous,L'ouvrage de Björn Wergen: Handbo
21-05-2024 16:12
Thomas FlammerSubstrate: not quite sure, on pluvious stem of a h
17-05-2024 16:25
Pavel JiracekErioscyphella lunata, found on a fallen needle of
20-05-2024 21:28
Nihad OmerovicHello,Found this Orbilia on a dry, attached twig o
18-05-2024 10:47
Anna KlosGoodmorning,We found this tiny ascomycete (max. 1m
25-03-2024 19:14
Juuso ÄikäsI found some small black pyrenos growing on a dead
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31
Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Extract_from_Wehmeyer_1933_(pp._77_78)