Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-04-2024 18:32

Anna Klos

Good evening,I found this Ascobolus on wet soil an

18-04-2024 18:52

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, J'ai beoin d'éclairage(s) pour ce Daldi

19-04-2024 14:28

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

Cudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit

13-04-2024 11:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, April 2024

16-04-2024 17:43

Giovanni ANTOLA Giovanni ANTOLA

Bonjour,Trouvé sous paille humide, autour d'un je

14-04-2024 20:04

Manak Roman

Hi all,I have two very similar finding last weeken

17-04-2024 10:44

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Juste à côté du cône avec "Hyphodiscus ayelii"

16-04-2024 22:53

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

14-04-2024 22:58

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

• Bactridium flavum (anamorph): Distinctive macr

15-04-2024 14:37

Eric Rousseau

Bonjour,Je sais que les cyphelles ne sont pas des

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Chris Yeates, 11-03-2012 12:48
Chris YeatesI have collected good material of an Echinosphaeria and would like to place images on the database. I am aware that there is no clear line between the two species - indeed some authorities suspect they are one and the same. What are the chief 'differences' please? I suspect this is a question for Alain and his special knowledge!

J'ai rassemblé bon matériel et que vous souhaitez placer des images sur la base de données. Je suis conscient qu'il n'ya pas de ligne claire entre les deux espèces. Quelles sont les 'différences' s'il vous plaît? Je soupçonne que c'est une question pour Alain et sa connaissance particulière!

merci et amitiés

Chris
Andrew N. Miller, 11-03-2012 15:37
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
E. canescens is believed to have smaller ascospores (17–24 x 3–4 µm) than E. strigosa (34–40 x 6–7 µm), but I have not seen good material of E. strigosa.  If anyone has good material of E. strigosa, I would love to sequence it and let DNA solve this mystery once and for all...;o)  I believe E. strigosa was described from England.

Andy
Chris Yeates, 11-03-2012 15:56
Chris Yeates
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
thanks for that Andy - of course the ascospores from my collection measure 24.2-28.6 x 4.8-6µm . . . . . typical! These spores are still hyaline and mostly non-septate, but were ejected in a water mount so presumably they're 'natural' size - I'll post some images later today.

there are few mycologists collecting these kind of fungi in the UK, but those who do and  are using Ellis & Ellis I as their source are going to be producing a confusing situation - that work does not include Lasiosphaeria strigosa, but does have L. canescens with spore measurements of 30-40 x 4-5µm.

Chris
Chris Yeates, 11-03-2012 16:04
Chris Yeates
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
images:
  • message #17750
Alain GARDIENNET, 11-03-2012 17:14
Alain GARDIENNET
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa

Hi Andy,
I have strigosa dated the 23rd december 2011. Is it too old ?
Chris, I've already got Echinosphaeria like yours...disturbing.
Alain

Andrew N. Miller, 11-03-2012 19:05
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Dear Alain,

  That would be perfect if the collection contains 20-30 ascomata.  I can try sequencing it and see where it comes in relation to E. canescens.  I already have several sequences of E. canescens from Europe and North America.

Andy
Hans-Otto Baral, 11-03-2012 21:50
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Hi all

I suppose the spores get distinctly narrower when placed in lethal media. Chris's spores are alive, according to the regular multiguttulate interior.

Zotto
Chris Yeates, 11-03-2012 22:40
Chris Yeates
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
yes they were alive; I shall dry the material and revive and look at it later in various reagents, to see if there are any significant differences

Chris
Bernard Declercq, 12-03-2012 13:23
Bernard Declercq
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Hi all,

E. canescens and E. strigosa not only have spores with different dimensions, but they have a different shape too. See paper in annex.

Best regards,
Bernard
Andrew N. Miller, 13-03-2012 15:58
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Bernard's beautiful photos just reminded me that what I have in my collections are lots of specimens of E. strigosa (the longer-spored species).  What I really need are collections of E. canescens (the shorter-spored species; 17–24 x 3–4 µm) for molecular study.  My apologies for my confusion...

Andy
Chris Yeates, 13-03-2012 21:09
Chris Yeates
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
So in view of that - and looking at Bernard's illustrations - should I label my collection "E. cf. strigosa" then?

Chris
Andrew N. Miller, 13-03-2012 21:50
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Echinosphaeria canescens/strigosa
Yes, if being nomenclaturally correct is important to you...;o)

Andy