Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

05-12-2025 17:33

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour, je serais heureux de recueillir votre avi

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Modern status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae in Gabarnaudia
Alex Akulov, 22-07-2011 23:48
Alex AkulovDear Friends
During investigation of my sample, I found an interesting representative of fungicolous fungi. I think it's "Oospora lasiosphariae", described in 1952 by French mycologist Gabriele Arnaud. In 1974 the name was reduced to synonyms of Gabarnaudia betae (anamorphic Sphaeronaemella).

Having studied the situation its seems to me that this decision was not entirely justified and it is possible that Oospora lasiosphariae deserves to be an independent species (as Gabarnaudia lasiosphaeriae). 

I can get culture of this species, but have no possibility to compare it with the culture of Gabarnaudia betae. Maybe someone interested in this work and will help me to understand the actual status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae?

Is anyone of you meet this species earlier?

I am waiting for your criticisms and ideas.
Alex
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961