29-12-2009 10:19
Alain GARDIENNET
Bonjour forum, Quelqu'un aurait-il les planches d
29-12-2009 00:28
Milanka TanaskovicBonjour à tous, En attendent la nouvelle version
20-12-2009 14:40
Alain GARDIENNET
Bonjour membres du forum, Lors d'une descente de
19-12-2009 14:05
VASILEIOS KAOUNASIt was found in the earth and in sphagnum. Size u
16-12-2009 22:49
Peter Welt
A friend of mine (Torsten Richter) looking for the
Tree section
Yannick Mourgues,
09-01-2010 20:35
Hi.Who could identify the tree with this section ? Is-it possible ?
I think it could be Salix.
Do you agree ?
Yannick
10016.jpg
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 20:37
Re:Tree section
Bonsoir,
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 20:54
Re:Tree section
Bonsoir Yannick
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:25
Re:Tree section
Yes Stip, this site is wonderful. Under "Species list" you find lots of European genera and species.
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:28
Re:Tree section
Hello,
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 21:40
Re:Tree section
Yes, in my memory Fraxinus was more diffuse pored
Stip
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:42
Re:Tree section
Here you can compare. Salix may show a slightly more dense aggregation of the pores in the spring region but never has the big pores of Fraxinus and Quercus.
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:45
Re:Tree section
Hello Zotto,
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas