18-07-2016 13:44
Pascal RIBOLLETBonjour Forum,Je cherche cet article récent sur l
17-07-2016 01:04
Malcolm GreavesThis single fruit body was found in the same woodl
16-07-2016 22:19
Rubén Martínez-GilHola a todos. Subo unas fotos de una Helvella que
17-07-2016 10:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonjour,Trouvé sur feuilles mortes de Calluna vul
16-07-2016 17:16
Bernard CLESSESur terre argileuse lourde et humide dans un senti
15-07-2016 16:25
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour,récolte sur un chemin en forêt, spores 1
nom.prov.
Malcolm Greaves,
18-07-2016 12:16
Mal
Chris Yeates,
18-07-2016 17:57
Re : nom.prov.
Hi Malcolm
as I understand it the status of a nom. prov. lies outside the ICBN rules http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php and therefore there won't be a time limit on it.
Anyone who is a regular on ASCOFrance will be familiar with people finding what are probably new and undescribed species. A provisional name gives at least a handle to further work on a taxon. If the finder or expert in the group has given it such a name one can also call it Xxxxxx xxxx Author ined.
I suspect that the modern way will increasingly be that new species are not formally described without sequencing; that will presumably add to the inevitable backlog.
It actually doesn't need to be too much of a problem really - thank heavens for the 'nom. prov.' system.
I shudder to think how many nom. prov's Zotto has got(!) but I would be the last person to put a time limit on him . . . . .
best wishes
Chris
as I understand it the status of a nom. prov. lies outside the ICBN rules http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php and therefore there won't be a time limit on it.
Anyone who is a regular on ASCOFrance will be familiar with people finding what are probably new and undescribed species. A provisional name gives at least a handle to further work on a taxon. If the finder or expert in the group has given it such a name one can also call it Xxxxxx xxxx Author ined.
I suspect that the modern way will increasingly be that new species are not formally described without sequencing; that will presumably add to the inevitable backlog.
It actually doesn't need to be too much of a problem really - thank heavens for the 'nom. prov.' system.
I shudder to think how many nom. prov's Zotto has got(!) but I would be the last person to put a time limit on him . . . . .
best wishes
Chris
Malcolm Greaves,
18-07-2016 23:23
Re : nom.prov.
Thanks for the info Chris.
Mal
Mal