12-01-2020 08:29
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour, récolte sur feuillu, spores 6,5-8,2 x 2
10-01-2020 17:20
Thomas LæssøeThis materal apparently fail to key out in the Mll
09-01-2020 16:04
Bernard Declercq
Hi,Collected on Xylodon nespori on decaying wood
09-01-2020 20:47
Juuso ÄikäsThese were growing on dead needles of Pinus sylves
08-01-2020 18:19
Enrique Rubio
Does anyone have a copy of this article?DÖBBELER
Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 08:29
Bonjour,
récolte sur feuillu, spores 6,5-8,2 x 2,1-2,3 µm. Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Patrice
Patrice
Doc1-0058.pdf
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-01-2020 08:56
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Hi Patrice
great how you took so many free spores. Surely it is, there is only one more important feature to look: the marginal cell size differentiates it from H. subfusispora. From the SBs in the spores I would already exclude it, but to be sure...
About the substrate: it is a decorticated angiosperm branch. Was it on the ground or attached?
Zotto
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 10:52
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
I placed the spore photos next to each other, and then cleaned up.
The marginal cells are small, less than 5 µm (difficult to have correct photos), which seems to go in the direction of H. fusispora, in my opinion like the size of the apothecia which was 2 mm for the largest.
Angiosperm branch was on the ground.
The marginal cells are small, less than 5 µm (difficult to have correct photos), which seems to go in the direction of H. fusispora, in my opinion like the size of the apothecia which was 2 mm for the largest.
Angiosperm branch was on the ground.
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-01-2020 13:25
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Yes I am sure - and amazing!
Cell size excludes subfusispora, so clearly H. fusispora.0
Patrice TANCHAUD,
12-01-2020 13:29
Re : Hyalorbilia fusispora ?
Thanks Zotto.