
14-09-2012 13:49
Peter ThompsonHello Everyone,I wonder if anyone has illustration

13-09-2012 11:30

Qualche amico ha il lavoro di Nannfeldt: Studien

11-09-2012 21:55

Hi all,I have found this small, valsoid Diaporthal

10-09-2012 20:27
Peter ThompsonHello Everyone,I would be very grateful to receive

12-09-2012 00:44
Esquivel-Rios EduardoHi all.Deighton reported Anellodochium ramulispori

10-09-2012 21:26
Esquivel-Rios EduardoHi all.Bombacopsis quinata is a native timber sp

10-09-2012 20:38
Peter ThompsonHello Everyone,I have been trying to find informat

11-09-2012 09:41

Bounjour aux amis d'Ascofrance... Pour une monogra
Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Peter Thompson,
14-09-2012 13:49
I wonder if anyone has illustrations and measurements of the ascospores of Diaporthe samaricola, which grows on the seed cases of Fraxinus excelsior.
There does not seem to be any information in the literature available to me.
Thanking you in anticipation,
Peter.
Christian Lechat,
14-09-2012 14:07

Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
Description here:
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
http://www.librifungorum.org/Image.asp?ItemID=157&ImageFileName=027/0126b.jpg
Cordially,
Christian
Alessio Pierotti,
14-09-2012 15:31

Re : Diaporthe samaricola - Spore Sizes & Appearance.
The name Diaporthe samaricola was proposed by W. Phillips & Plowright in 1876 with the following diagnosis: "Perithceia minute, immersed, covered by a circumscribed thin black stroma, variable in size and outline; ostiola minute, prominent; sporidia biseriate, colourless, quadrinucleate, somewhat acuminate, .0007 in. x .002 in.; asci .003 x .0004 in. On the samari of ash, Terrington, Jan. 1875. Plate 42, fig. 6. a. ascus; b. sporidia" [Grevillea 3 (27): 126. 1875].
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).
Lewis Wehmeyer in his monograph of the genus published in 1933 writes of this species on pages 77 and 78 (see attachment: EXTRACT etc.; see also the attachment: 1932-v17-237-0001).