Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-04-2017 18:52

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum-members, The wonderful advantage of As

23-04-2017 14:48

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour à tous,De petites apothécies (1-1,5 mm d

30-04-2013 10:07

Gilles Corriol Gilles Corriol

Je cherche de la doc sur le genre Ophiobolus.Je di

24-04-2017 12:43

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à tous, Je sais qu'il ne s'agit pas d'un

22-04-2017 22:23

Rubén Martínez-Gil Rubén Martínez-Gil

Hola, buenas noches. Subo unas fotos de un asco q

23-04-2017 16:48

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à tous,Hypogé sous épicéa (Picea abies

23-04-2017 17:06

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Dans le même bois que l'autre Elaphomyces mais ic

17-04-2017 16:28

Thorben Hülsewig

Hi there,a friend had send me an interesting fung

23-04-2017 11:14

Matthias Mann Matthias Mann

Dear Forum, eaven though the Spores would show a c

19-04-2017 18:19

Alain BRISSARD

Bonsoir à tous Faut-il rejeter systématiquement

« < 743 744 745 746 747 > »
Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
François Bartholomeeusen, 17-04-2017 18:52
Dear forum-members,

The wonderful advantage of Ascofrance is: easy browsing trough the past.
I refer to the item of 16-05-2013 by Susana Garcia on Eupropolella "hederae" Baral Nom. Prov.


I found on a dry leaf of Hedera black spots. After moistening olive-green apothecia (diameter: 87 µm) break through the epidermis (3 to 4 splits).
ASCI: clavate cylindrical,: 60,961-102,42 x 9.65-15.94 µm, color red in IKI and the apex is a little blue;
Paraphyse: 78,04 x 65,09-2.59-3.58 µm; filiform, septated and sometimes branched;
Spores: cylindrical filled completely with Lb's: 17-19,88 x 4.86-5.49 µm, Q = 3.52.


Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?


Thanks in advance


François Bartholomeeusen

  • message #48509
  • message #48509
  • message #48509
  • message #48509
  • message #48509
  • message #48509
Hans-Otto Baral, 23-04-2017 09:42
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
Yes it is unpublished, and it is very similar to E. britannica, but when I see at the consistent occurrence on Hedera vs. Prunus laurocerasus I think it must be something different.

Your sample  seems to be well developed and abundant, such samples would be great to gain a sequence of. So far no sequence exists in GenBank for this genus.

Zotto
François Bartholomeeusen, 23-04-2017 10:43
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
Hi Zotto,

I knew that I had to have patience! Thank you for your confirmation.
Unfortunately, being an amateur, the case stops here for me.

Cordial greetings,

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 23-04-2017 11:09
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
Well, I think there would be posibilities that someone got interest in doing molecular work on it. If you were willing to send the dry sample I will give you an address which will cause you no costs.
Zotto
François Bartholomeeusen, 23-04-2017 11:17
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
That would be very good, I am certainly willing to cooperate.

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 24-04-2017 22:00
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
Hi Francois
I am sorry, what I thought must be British material, otherwise it becomes difficult. It could be that useful samples from Britain exist and can be sequenced. We will see. So please keep the specimen in your herbarium, who knows...

Zotto
François Bartholomeeusen, 24-04-2017 22:29
Re : Is Eupropolella hederae Baral still "nom. Prov"?
Thank you very much Zotto for all the effort!

Greetings,

François