 
                                    14-12-2011 21:55
 Hans-Otto Baral
                Hans-Otto Baral
                Hi allLong ago we had this Cosmospora on Diatrype
 
                                    10-12-2011 12:45
¡Hola, de nuevo! Apotecios amarillos citrinos, e
 
                                    12-12-2011 23:00
Hola a todos!Apotecios de 1 mm, en zona dorsal de
 
                                    10-12-2011 12:16
 Björn Wergen
                Björn Wergen
                Hi,I want to tell you something about my new page:
 
                                    07-12-2011 21:12
Daniel GhyselinckBonsoir à tous,Voici une pezize récoltée ce wee
Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
    
                    Hans-Otto Baral,
                14-12-2011 21:55
    
     Hi all
Hi allLong ago we had this Cosmospora on Diatrype bullata here:
http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_forum/5952??
Now, Ingo Wagner found this species again (he had it also 3 years ago), and would lke to know if there are any news about it. He sent me his images.
Zotto
                                    Jean-Paul Priou,
                                14-12-2011 22:24            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                sans doute une creation de Chris Lechat, Cosmospora diatrypicola in Fungal planet 
Without doubt, a Christian species
Waiting for the father answer !
JPP
                
                
                
                
                
                            Without doubt, a Christian species
Waiting for the father answer !
JPP
                                    Alain GARDIENNET,
                                15-12-2011 07:10            
            Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Yes, it looks like the one I found, and I remember Guy and you have already found it too. http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_forum/8050
It's a very common species.
For it, like for an incredible number of bad-known or new species, we should wait studies.
Alain
                
                
                
                
                
                            It's a very common species.
For it, like for an incredible number of bad-known or new species, we should wait studies.
Alain
                                    Christian Lechat,
                                15-12-2011 07:13            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Dear all,
Cosmospora diatrypicola is not yet published, it is only a working name.
It is a member of the very large group of species occuring on "Pyrenomycetes" at present under investigation.
Christian
                
                
                
                
                
                            Cosmospora diatrypicola is not yet published, it is only a working name.
It is a member of the very large group of species occuring on "Pyrenomycetes" at present under investigation.
Christian
                                    Hans-Otto Baral,
                                15-12-2011 12:27            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Thanks all. 
I saw that I placed the folder with this species in Dialonectria. Was that an error?
Zotto
                
                
                
                
                
                            I saw that I placed the folder with this species in Dialonectria. Was that an error?
Zotto
                                    Christian Lechat,
                                15-12-2011 15:37            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Hi Zotto,
Correct name should be Stylonectria because of the broad, flat apical disc, in Dialonectria, the ascomata have a papilla.
Regards,
Christian
                
                
                
                
                
                            Correct name should be Stylonectria because of the broad, flat apical disc, in Dialonectria, the ascomata have a papilla.
Regards,
Christian
                                    Hans-Otto Baral,
                                15-12-2011 17:12            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Uff, is that necessary to distinguish so many genera? Even if the phylogeny tells for different groups we need not a genus for every clade :-(
Zotto
                
                
                
                
                
                            Zotto
                                    Christian Lechat,
                                15-12-2011 17:54            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                Species of Cosmospora s. l. are too numerous in the world, it is necessary to divide the genus, even if they seem identical, they are different in having morphological characteristics well visible, when many specimens are examined, it is evident that there are several genera. 
Christian
                
                
                
                
                
                            Christian
                                    Hans-Otto Baral,
                                15-12-2011 18:18            
             
                Re : Cosmospora aff. magnusiana
                We have this problem in Orbilia, there are probably 500 species or more. But without sequences you cannot  say in quite a lot of cases in ??which group within Orbilia a species belongs. I repeatedly think about splitting Orbilia in several genera, but the problem is always where to stop. Segregation of Hyalorbilia was a necessity, although a few species are not really easy to assign. Segregation of Amphosoma with a few species was a next step, but after that it became quite difficult, and there are still 350 species remaining in Orbilia.
It is actually a matter of taste. In the Luteorubella-group there are two extremely different anamorphs (Anguillospora and Pseudotripoconidium), although the two groups are so closely related that the teleomorphs cannot be distinguished. If you separate here two genera, then Orbilia would break into 20 or more genera.
Zotto
                
                
                
                
                
                            It is actually a matter of taste. In the Luteorubella-group there are two extremely different anamorphs (Anguillospora and Pseudotripoconidium), although the two groups are so closely related that the teleomorphs cannot be distinguished. If you separate here two genera, then Orbilia would break into 20 or more genera.
Zotto

