Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

21-03-2026 15:13

Lepista Zacarias

Hello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu

21-03-2026 22:59

Petr Soucek

Good evening, I would appreciate some advice on th

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

20-10-2017 09:23

Garcia Susana

Este otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu

20-03-2026 16:16

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eutypa or Diatrype sp on Salix
Watt John, 05-09-2017 12:27
Whilst on recording foray with Northwest Fungus Group near river Mersey in damp woodlands, I found a pyrenomycete growing on the bark of attached dead Salix branch.  The sulcate ostioles have the cross feature of Diatrypaceae; without green-yellow fluid on section( E. flavovirens), and no colour reaction with KOH. Asci are 8 spored without blue reaction around apparatus from Lugol's and the a.spores are mostly around 6 x 1 -15.mc, pale. I could see plenty of fine simple paraphyses which seemed to rule out sp such as Eutypa maura. I repeated the squash with Cotton Blue and this time some perithicia seemed to be without paraphyses though they were evident elsewhere on slide.  
Some texts disagree on presence of paraphyses in some of these species.
I had a look at the Salix associated species on this website but didn't seem to be one of those.  
Not even quite sure whether it be Eutypa or Diatrype though it does look like Diatrype bullata, but for the paraphyses. 

I do understand there is some fluidity amongst the taxonomy of this group. 

John Watt
Ormskirk,
England


  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274