Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-06-2017 23:02

Elsa Sousa

Good evening,I found these asco's on a shadowed we

06-06-2017 22:29

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à tous,Trouvé dernièrement cet asco sur

06-06-2017 09:57

Steve Clements

Bonjour,Je pense que nous avons trouvé Tubeufia c

06-06-2017 20:39

Lepista Zacarias

Dear all,Maybe some of you can pronounce about thi

06-06-2017 20:28

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Dear collegues, during a research on teleomorphs

06-06-2017 16:50

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

Unfortunately, I do not have a picture of the apot

06-06-2017 10:22

Simon Kennedy

I continue to struggle with the identity of a dema

05-06-2017 13:30

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour à tous,Sur Rubus idaeus.J'aimerais savoir

04-06-2017 23:55

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola a todos/asEstas Escutellinia están recolecta

04-06-2017 02:16

Elsa Sousa

Good evening,I found this pyreno on falling branch

« < 745 746 747 748 749 > »
Eutypa or Diatrype sp on Salix
Watt John, 05-09-2017 12:27
Whilst on recording foray with Northwest Fungus Group near river Mersey in damp woodlands, I found a pyrenomycete growing on the bark of attached dead Salix branch.  The sulcate ostioles have the cross feature of Diatrypaceae; without green-yellow fluid on section( E. flavovirens), and no colour reaction with KOH. Asci are 8 spored without blue reaction around apparatus from Lugol's and the a.spores are mostly around 6 x 1 -15.mc, pale. I could see plenty of fine simple paraphyses which seemed to rule out sp such as Eutypa maura. I repeated the squash with Cotton Blue and this time some perithicia seemed to be without paraphyses though they were evident elsewhere on slide.  
Some texts disagree on presence of paraphyses in some of these species.
I had a look at the Salix associated species on this website but didn't seem to be one of those.  
Not even quite sure whether it be Eutypa or Diatrype though it does look like Diatrype bullata, but for the paraphyses. 

I do understand there is some fluidity amongst the taxonomy of this group. 

John Watt
Ormskirk,
England


  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274
  • message #50274