06-09-2017 17:48
Yulia Shcherbakova
Dear forum! I am looking for data on cultural cha
06-09-2017 05:36
Ethan CrensonIn New York City, Inwood Hill Park. On a branch of
05-09-2017 12:27
Watt JohnWhilst on recording foray with Northwest Fungus Gr
01-09-2017 22:15
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à tous,Je pense avoir trouvé Pulvinula
03-09-2017 11:36
Alex Akulov
Dear friendsYesterday among the recently collected
03-09-2017 17:26
Lieve Deceuninck
Dear Forummembers I've a problem with an asco onÂ
03-09-2017 10:09
Ueli Graf
Hallo, habe etwas auf Hasenkot gefunden und ich ka
Coprotus?
Malcolm Greaves,
22-09-2015 21:15
A cluster of these quite small fungi on dung(max 0.6mm) Although there were no hairs round the edge the seemed to be one or two hairs from the middle of some of the Apothecia. Oval,smooth spores c22.5-25.5 x 14.2-14.6. I thought Coprotus was the closest but I am not convinced.Thanks
Mal
Peter Püwert,
22-09-2015 21:34
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Malcolm,
in my opinion is that no Coprotus. However, I can give at the moment also no other recommendation.
Greetings Peter.
With the type Coprotus the paraphyses are very important for determination.
in my opinion is that no Coprotus. However, I can give at the moment also no other recommendation.
Greetings Peter.
With the type Coprotus the paraphyses are very important for determination.
Hans-Otto Baral,
22-09-2015 21:43
Re : Coprotus?
My impression is that of a Pseudombrophila, but I may be wrong.
Zotto
Zotto
Michel Delpont,
23-09-2015 09:27
Re : Coprotus?
Hello Mal.
Yes, your fungus is not necessarily Coprotus, but lacks details to continue; did you do the reaction to Melzer to check?
Michel.
Yes, your fungus is not necessarily Coprotus, but lacks details to continue; did you do the reaction to Melzer to check?
Michel.
Malcolm Greaves,
23-09-2015 10:38
Re : Coprotus?
Thanks.
No reaction to Meltzers. Is there anything else I could look for?
Mal
No reaction to Meltzers. Is there anything else I could look for?
Mal
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 12:04
Re : Coprotus?
In my impression, it could be also Iodophanus carneus.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
23-09-2015 12:09
no Iodophanus
Hi Uwe,
Mal wrote that there was no reaction with Melzers reagent. Furthermore, the spores appear to be fully smooth.
Best regards from Lothar
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 12:15
Re : Coprotus?
OK.
Es war nur eine Idee. Wegen des Paraphysen- und des Sporeninhalts.
Ja, richtig, der Ascus bei Iodophanus ist jod-positiv und die Sporen fein-warzig.
Sorry for my wrong path...
Viele Grüße
Uwe
Es war nur eine Idee. Wegen des Paraphysen- und des Sporeninhalts.
Ja, richtig, der Ascus bei Iodophanus ist jod-positiv und die Sporen fein-warzig.
Sorry for my wrong path...
Viele Grüße
Uwe
Hans-Otto Baral,
23-09-2015 13:06
Re : Coprotus?
Malcolm's last photo was in Melzer's, so the characteristic paraphysis content of Iodophanus would be destroyed. I don't know a clear character of Pseudombrophila, but the macroscopy reminds me of that genus.
Zotto
Zotto
Uwe Lindemann,
23-09-2015 14:56
Re : Coprotus?
Shows last photo of Mal the reaction in Melzer? Sorry for my further asking.
Best, Uwe
Best, Uwe
Malcolm Greaves,
23-09-2015 21:44
Re : Coprotus?
Uwe
Yes the last photo was in meltzers
Mal
Yes the last photo was in meltzers
Mal